PortfoliosLab logo
SA vs. GLDM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SA and GLDM is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

SA vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Seabridge Gold Inc. (SA) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SA:

-0.35

GLDM:

2.42

Sortino Ratio

SA:

-0.14

GLDM:

3.34

Omega Ratio

SA:

0.98

GLDM:

1.43

Calmar Ratio

SA:

-0.22

GLDM:

5.40

Martin Ratio

SA:

-0.57

GLDM:

14.50

Ulcer Index

SA:

28.78%

GLDM:

3.01%

Daily Std Dev

SA:

50.95%

GLDM:

17.49%

Max Drawdown

SA:

-90.99%

GLDM:

-21.63%

Current Drawdown

SA:

-67.41%

GLDM:

-2.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SA achieves a 10.60% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 26.81% return.


SA

YTD

10.60%

1M

13.08%

6M

-24.70%

1Y

-17.25%

5Y*

-1.79%

10Y*

7.39%

GLDM

YTD

26.81%

1M

4.98%

6M

23.91%

1Y

40.70%

5Y*

14.33%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SA vs. GLDM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SA is 3535
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SA is 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SA is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SA is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SA is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SA is 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GLDM is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GLDM is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GLDM is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GLDM is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GLDM is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GLDM is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SA vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seabridge Gold Inc. (SA) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SA Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SA and GLDM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

SA vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

Neither SA nor GLDM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SA vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SA drawdown since its inception was -90.99%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SA and GLDM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

SA vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

Seabridge Gold Inc. (SA) has a higher volatility of 15.51% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 8.55%. This indicates that SA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...