PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SA vs. AAAU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SA and AAAU is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

SA vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Seabridge Gold Inc. (SA) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-34.85%
15.00%
SA
AAAU

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SA:

0.38

AAAU:

2.95

Sortino Ratio

SA:

0.91

AAAU:

3.72

Omega Ratio

SA:

1.11

AAAU:

1.50

Calmar Ratio

SA:

0.26

AAAU:

5.49

Martin Ratio

SA:

0.95

AAAU:

15.09

Ulcer Index

SA:

20.49%

AAAU:

2.96%

Daily Std Dev

SA:

51.59%

AAAU:

15.14%

Max Drawdown

SA:

-90.99%

AAAU:

-21.63%

Current Drawdown

SA:

-70.89%

AAAU:

-1.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SA achieves a -1.23% return, which is significantly lower than AAAU's 9.98% return.


SA

YTD

-1.23%

1M

-6.47%

6M

-34.86%

1Y

0.00%

5Y*

-3.05%

10Y*

3.77%

AAAU

YTD

9.98%

1M

6.97%

6M

14.99%

1Y

43.73%

5Y*

12.59%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SA vs. AAAU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SA is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SA is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SA is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SA is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SA is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SA is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

AAAU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AAAU is 9494
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AAAU is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AAAU is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AAAU is 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AAAU is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AAAU is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SA vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seabridge Gold Inc. (SA) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SA, currently valued at 0.38, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.382.95
The chart of Sortino ratio for SA, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.913.72
The chart of Omega ratio for SA, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.111.50
The chart of Calmar ratio for SA, currently valued at 0.33, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.335.49
The chart of Martin ratio for SA, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.9515.09
SA
AAAU

The current SA Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the AAAU Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SA and AAAU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.38
2.95
SA
AAAU

Dividends

SA vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison

Neither SA nor AAAU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SA vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SA drawdown since its inception was -90.99%, which is greater than AAAU's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SA and AAAU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-50.40%
-1.48%
SA
AAAU

Volatility

SA vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison

Seabridge Gold Inc. (SA) has a higher volatility of 20.39% compared to Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) at 3.78%. This indicates that SA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
20.39%
3.78%
SA
AAAU
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab