PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RYT vs. COWZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


RYTCOWZ

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between RYT and COWZ is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

RYT vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
8.85%
RYT
COWZ

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RYT vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.


COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Expense ratio chart for COWZ: current value at 0.49% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.49%
Expense ratio chart for RYT: current value at 0.40% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.40%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RYT vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Technology ETF (RYT) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYT
Sharpe ratio
No data
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RYT, currently valued at 0.00, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.00
COWZ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for COWZ, currently valued at 2.08, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.08
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for COWZ, currently valued at 2.98, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.98
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for COWZ, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.36
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for COWZ, currently valued at 3.75, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.75
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for COWZ, currently valued at 8.93, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.008.93

RYT vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.00
2.08
RYT
COWZ

Dividends

RYT vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

RYT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
RYT
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Technology ETF
0.00%0.97%0.72%0.51%1.30%0.93%0.98%0.85%1.17%1.18%1.18%0.82%
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.81%1.92%1.96%1.48%2.54%1.96%1.67%1.94%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RYT vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-13.15%
0
RYT
COWZ

Volatility

RYT vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Technology ETF (RYT) is 0.00%, while Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) has a volatility of 3.94%. This indicates that RYT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
3.94%
RYT
COWZ