PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RYI vs. FMILX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RYI and FMILX is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

RYI vs. FMILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ryerson Holding Corporation (RYI) and Fidelity New Millennium Fund (FMILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
17.29%
8.04%
RYI
FMILX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RYI:

-0.61

FMILX:

1.54

Sortino Ratio

RYI:

-0.69

FMILX:

2.06

Omega Ratio

RYI:

0.92

FMILX:

1.29

Calmar Ratio

RYI:

-0.51

FMILX:

2.28

Martin Ratio

RYI:

-0.86

FMILX:

7.97

Ulcer Index

RYI:

34.85%

FMILX:

2.91%

Daily Std Dev

RYI:

49.04%

FMILX:

15.01%

Max Drawdown

RYI:

-81.24%

FMILX:

-56.03%

Current Drawdown

RYI:

-47.90%

FMILX:

-2.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYI achieves a 18.64% return, which is significantly higher than FMILX's 4.75% return. Over the past 10 years, RYI has outperformed FMILX with an annualized return of 13.18%, while FMILX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.78% annualized return.


RYI

YTD

18.64%

1M

5.78%

6M

15.59%

1Y

-35.34%

5Y*

21.17%

10Y*

13.18%

FMILX

YTD

4.75%

1M

1.72%

6M

9.10%

1Y

21.52%

5Y*

11.53%

10Y*

5.78%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RYI vs. FMILX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RYI is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RYI is 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RYI is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RYI is 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RYI is 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RYI is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

FMILX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FMILX is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FMILX is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FMILX is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FMILX is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FMILX is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FMILX is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RYI vs. FMILX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ryerson Holding Corporation (RYI) and Fidelity New Millennium Fund (FMILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RYI, currently valued at -0.61, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.611.54
The chart of Sortino ratio for RYI, currently valued at -0.69, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.692.06
The chart of Omega ratio for RYI, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.921.29
The chart of Calmar ratio for RYI, currently valued at -0.51, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.512.28
The chart of Martin ratio for RYI, currently valued at -0.86, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.867.97
RYI
FMILX

The current RYI Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the FMILX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYI and FMILX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.61
1.54
RYI
FMILX

Dividends

RYI vs. FMILX - Dividend Comparison

RYI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than FMILX's 0.19% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RYI
Ryerson Holding Corporation
3.42%4.06%2.07%1.77%0.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FMILX
Fidelity New Millennium Fund
0.19%0.20%0.30%1.63%2.04%1.59%0.97%1.25%0.90%1.18%1.03%9.39%

Drawdowns

RYI vs. FMILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYI drawdown since its inception was -81.24%, which is greater than FMILX's maximum drawdown of -56.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYI and FMILX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-47.90%
-2.90%
RYI
FMILX

Volatility

RYI vs. FMILX - Volatility Comparison

Ryerson Holding Corporation (RYI) has a higher volatility of 13.59% compared to Fidelity New Millennium Fund (FMILX) at 4.45%. This indicates that RYI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
13.59%
4.45%
RYI
FMILX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab