PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYCYX vs. RYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYCYX vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Dow 2x Strategy Fund (RYCYX) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYCYX achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly higher than RYLD's 10.06% return.


RYCYX

1D
0.20%
1M
3.64%
YTD
12.15%
6M
10.56%
1Y
41.04%
3Y*
23.07%
5Y*
12.93%
10Y*
18.14%

RYLD

1D
0.01%
1M
2.64%
YTD
10.06%
6M
8.71%
1Y
22.00%
3Y*
8.90%
5Y*
2.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYCYX vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RYCYX
Rydex Dow 2x Strategy Fund
12.15%18.63%19.61%22.59%-20.44%39.43%1.17%13.91%
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
10.06%5.65%10.13%0.27%-13.03%22.13%-0.44%8.86%

Correlation

The correlation between RYCYX and RYLD is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2019

0.74

The correlation between RYCYX and RYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYCYX vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYCYX
RYCYX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
RYCYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

RYLD
RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYCYX vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Dow 2x Strategy Fund (RYCYX) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYCYXRYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.44

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

3.51

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.72

14.19

-6.47

RYCYX vs. RYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYCYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYCYX and RYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYCYX vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYCYX drawdown since its inception was -82.36%, which is greater than RYLD's maximum drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCYX and RYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYCYXRYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.36%

-41.53%

-40.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.49%

-6.29%

-13.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.15%

-19.05%

-13.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.72%

-21.33%

-19.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

0.00%

-1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.08%

-8.78%

-9.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.35%

1.55%

+3.80%

Volatility

RYCYX vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

Rydex Dow 2x Strategy Fund (RYCYX) has a higher volatility of 8.79% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) at 1.94%. This indicates that RYCYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYCYXRYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.79%

1.94%

+6.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.70%

7.78%

+11.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.98%

10.66%

+14.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.73%

14.05%

+15.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.27%

17.15%

+18.12%

RYCYX vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYCYX has a 2.61% expense ratio, which is higher than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYCYX vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

RYCYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than RYLD's 12.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYCYX
Rydex Dow 2x Strategy Fund
1.60%1.80%4.14%0.48%2.55%4.76%0.00%3.81%0.00%5.81%0.65%7.34%
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
12.61%12.00%12.03%12.64%13.49%12.35%10.76%6.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYCYX and RYLD have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYCYX has higher volatility (8.79%) compared to RYLD (1.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYCYX dropped -82.36% vs RYLD's -41.53%.

RYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYCYX and RYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer