RYCEY vs. META

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META).

Performance

RYCEY vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RYCEY vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc	-1.91%	123.64%	88.21%	253.27%	-33.95%	2.53%	-82.05%	-12.69%	-7.35%	40.70%
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	-13.25%	13.09%	66.05%	194.13%	-64.22%	23.13%	33.09%	56.57%	-25.71%	53.38%

Fundamentals

Market Cap RYCEY : $129.57B META : $1.47T
EPS RYCEY : $0.99 META : $23.51
PE Ratio RYCEY : 15.57 META : 24.34
PEG Ratio RYCEY : 0.03 META : 1.00
PS Ratio RYCEY : 3.25 META : 7.32
PB Ratio RYCEY : 47.61 META : 6.78
Total Revenue (TTM) RYCEY : $40.04B META : $200.97B
Gross Profit (TTM) RYCEY : $10.10B META : $164.79B
EBITDA (TTM) RYCEY : $8.04B META : $104.55B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYCEY achieves a -1.91% return, which is significantly higher than META's -13.25% return. Over the past 10 years, RYCEY has underperformed META with an annualized return of 6.05%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 17.39% annualized return.

RYCEY

• 1D: 5.83%
• 1M: -17.19%
• YTD: -1.91%
• 6M: -4.81%
• 1Y: 59.09%
• 3Y*: 105.06%
• 5Y*: 58.30%
• 10Y*: 6.05%

META

• 1D: 6.67%
• 1M: -11.66%
• YTD: -13.25%
• 6M: -21.96%
• 1Y: -0.42%
• 3Y*: 39.60%
• 5Y*: 14.06%
• 10Y*: 17.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RYCEY vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYCEY

RYCEY Risk / Return Rank: 84
RYCEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
RYCEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
RYCEY Omega Ratio Rank: 82
RYCEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
RYCEY Martin Ratio Rank: 88

META

META Risk / Return Rank: 40
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
META Omega Ratio Rank: 37
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
META Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYCEY vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RYCEY	META	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	-0.01	+1.62
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.15	0.29	+1.87
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.04	+0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.54	-0.01	+2.55
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.86	-0.04	+8.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RYCEY vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYCEY Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYCEY and META, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RYCEY	META	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.61	-0.01	+1.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.38	0.32	+1.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12	0.45	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.25	0.55	-0.79

Correlation

The correlation between RYCEY and META is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

RYCEY vs. META - Dividend Comparison

RYCEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than META's 0.37% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc	0.88%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.51%	1.56%	1.32%	1.55%	4.19%	14.44%
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	0.37%	0.32%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

RYCEY vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYCEY drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCEY and META.

Drawdown Indicators

	RYCEY	META	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.07%	-76.74%	-22.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.75%	-33.30%	+11.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-62.01%	-76.74%	+14.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-94.64%	-76.74%	-17.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-80.53%	-27.41%	-53.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-84.27%	-15.19%	-69.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.22%	13.13%	-6.91%

Volatility

RYCEY vs. META - Volatility Comparison

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) has a higher volatility of 17.32% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 13.64%. This indicates that RYCEY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RYCEY	META	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.32%	13.64%	+3.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.30%	26.73%	-1.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.09%	39.91%	-2.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.67%	43.77%	-1.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.90%	38.46%	+10.44%

Financials

RYCEY vs. META - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rolls-Royce Holdings plc and Meta Platforms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

RYCEY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 3.19B and revenue of 11.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 48.99B and revenue of 59.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.8%.

RYCEY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 24.75B and revenue of 59.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.3%.

RYCEY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a net income of 1.42B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 22.77B and revenue of 59.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.0%.