RYCEY vs. META

In the year-to-date period, RYCEY achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly lower than META's 18.67% return. Over the past 10 years, RYCEY has underperformed META with an annualized return of 3.66%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 24.42% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current RYCEY Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYCEY and META, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

RYCEY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.

The maximum RYCEY drawdown since its inception was -91.66%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCEY and META. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) has a higher volatility of 8.20% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 5.69%. This indicates that RYCEY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rolls-Royce Holdings plc and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.