PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RXRX vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RXRX vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RXRX) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RXRX achieves a -11.74% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's -8.34% return.


RXRX

1D
-4.75%
1M
6.49%
YTD
-11.74%
6M
-16.44%
1Y
-17.39%
3Y*
-24.02%
5Y*
-33.81%
10Y*

MSFT

1D
-4.17%
1M
6.71%
YTD
-8.34%
6M
-9.54%
1Y
-3.71%
3Y*
10.44%
5Y*
13.35%
10Y*
25.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RXRX vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RXRX
Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
-11.74%-39.50%-31.44%27.89%-54.99%-45.27%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-8.34%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%29.77%

Correlation

The correlation between RXRX and MSFT is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2021

0.30

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RXRX:

$1.91B

MSFT:

$3.29T

EPS

RXRX:

-$1.17

MSFT:

$16.79

PS Ratio

RXRX:

26.15

MSFT:

10.34

PB Ratio

RXRX:

1.86

MSFT:

7.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

RXRX:

$66.29M

MSFT:

$318.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RXRX:

-$22.83M

MSFT:

$217.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

RXRX:

-$505.90M

MSFT:

$200.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RXRX vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RXRX
RXRX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
RXRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RXRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
RXRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
RXRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
RXRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RXRX vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RXRX) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RXRXMSFTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.24

-0.15

-0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.16

-0.04

+0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.00

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.23

-0.10

-0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.39

-0.21

-0.18

RXRX vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RXRX Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RXRX and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RXRXMSFTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

-0.15

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.36

0.50

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.37

0.75

-1.12

Drawdowns

RXRX vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RXRX drawdown since its inception was -93.13%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXRX and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RXRXMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.13%

-69.38%

-23.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.17%

-33.91%

-24.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.09%

-33.91%

-48.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.13%

-37.15%

-55.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.27%

-18.07%

-73.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.33%

-21.78%

-53.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.04%

15.90%

+19.14%

Volatility

RXRX vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RXRX) has a higher volatility of 18.74% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 9.31%. This indicates that RXRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RXRXMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.74%

9.31%

+9.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.79%

22.14%

+22.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.46%

24.92%

+48.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

93.46%

26.59%

+66.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

93.62%

27.03%

+66.59%

Dividends

RXRX vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

RXRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.81%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%
RXRX
Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

RXRX vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
6.47M
82.89B
(RXRX) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RXRX and MSFT have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RXRX has higher volatility (18.74%) compared to MSFT (9.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RXRX dropped -93.13% vs MSFT's -69.38%.

MSFT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RXRX and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer