RWO vs. SLYV
RWO (SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF) and SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RWO is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones Global Select Real Estate Securities Index, while SLYV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RWO returned 3.78%/yr vs 10.63%/yr for SLYV. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RWO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SLYV.
Performance
RWO vs. SLYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWO achieves a 10.38% return, which is significantly lower than SLYV's 17.70% return. Over the past 10 years, RWO has underperformed SLYV with an annualized return of 3.78%, while SLYV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.63% annualized return.
RWO
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- 10.38%
- 6M
- 10.62%
- 1Y
- 15.08%
- 3Y*
- 11.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.33%
- 10Y*
- 3.78%
SLYV
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 3.12%
- YTD
- 17.70%
- 6M
- 15.50%
- 1Y
- 39.46%
- 3Y*
- 15.47%
- 5Y*
- 6.55%
- 10Y*
- 10.63%
RWO vs. SLYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWO SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF | 10.38% | 8.87% | 1.76% | 10.91% | -25.11% | 31.03% | -10.44% | 21.17% | -6.04% | 7.80% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 17.70% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.82% | -11.08% | 30.57% | 2.68% | 24.26% | -12.77% | 11.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWO and SLYV is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2008 | 0.70 |
The correlation between RWO and SLYV shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWO vs. SLYV — Risk / Return Rank
RWO
SLYV
RWO vs. SLYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RWO | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.37 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 4.24 | -2.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.11 | 14.05 | -7.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RWO vs. SLYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWO drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, which is greater than SLYV's maximum drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWO and SLYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWO | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.69% | -61.15% | -6.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.51% | -9.36% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.66% | -28.68% | +11.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.85% | -28.68% | -4.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.27% | -47.73% | +4.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.73% | -1.48% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.65% | -8.93% | -3.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 2.82% | -0.35% |
Volatility
RWO vs. SLYV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) is 4.50%, while SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that RWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWO | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.50% | 4.75% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.86% | 11.73% | -1.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.14% | 18.31% | -5.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 21.91% | -4.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.24% | 23.98% | -5.74% |
RWO vs. SLYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SLYV's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
RWO vs. SLYV - Dividend Comparison
RWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, more than SLYV's 2.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWO SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF | 4.20% | 3.62% | 3.68% | 3.53% | 3.69% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 3.97% | 3.90% | 3.26% | 3.77% | 2.97% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 2.28% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RWO and SLYV have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLYV has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to RWO (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWO dropped -67.69% vs SLYV's -61.15%.
On 10-year performance, SLYV leads with 10.63% vs 3.78% for RWO. On fees, SLYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RWO has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLYV has performed better with a 10.63% return vs 3.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RWO.
RWO has the higher dividend yield at 4.20%, compared with 2.28% for SLYV.
RWO is categorized as REIT, while SLYV is Small Cap Value Equities. RWO tracks Dow Jones Global Select Real Estate Securities Index, while SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RWO and 0.15% for SLYV.
SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RWO and SLYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer