RWM vs. UDOW
RWM (ProShares Short Russell2000) and UDOW (ProShares UltraPro Dow30) are both exchange-traded funds - RWM is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 (-100%), while UDOW is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RWM returned -11.71%/yr vs 23.46%/yr for UDOW. At a correlation of -0.79, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
RWM vs. UDOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWM achieves a -16.23% return, which is significantly lower than UDOW's 23.79% return. Over the past 10 years, RWM has underperformed UDOW with an annualized return of -11.71%, while UDOW has yielded a comparatively higher 23.46% annualized return.
RWM
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- 6M
- -11.58%
- YTD
- -16.23%
- 1Y
- -23.83%
- 3Y*
- -11.76%
- 5Y*
- -5.71%
- 10Y*
- -11.71%
UDOW
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 7.98%
- 6M
- 13.75%
- YTD
- 23.79%
- 1Y
- 50.66%
- 3Y*
- 35.97%
- 5Y*
- 14.82%
- 10Y*
- 23.46%
RWM vs. UDOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWM ProShares Short Russell2000 | -16.23% | -9.40% | -5.91% | -10.43% | 18.34% | -17.90% | -31.04% | -19.83% | 11.57% | -13.61% |
UDOW ProShares UltraPro Dow30 | 23.79% | 24.46% | 28.47% | 32.72% | -32.39% | 65.67% | -17.15% | 75.24% | -23.86% | 99.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWM and UDOW is -0.77, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | -0.79 |
The correlation between RWM and UDOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.80 to -0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
RWM vs. UDOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RWM
UDOW
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
RWM
UDOW
Basic Materials
RWM
-
UDOW
Communication Services
RWM
-
UDOW
Consumer Cyclical
RWM
-
UDOW
Consumer Defensive
RWM
-
UDOW
Energy
RWM
-
UDOW
Healthcare
RWM
-
UDOW
Industrials
RWM
-
UDOW
Real Estate
RWM
-
UDOW
-
Technology
RWM
-
UDOW
Utilities
RWM
-
UDOW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWM vs. UDOW — Risk / Return Rank
RWM
UDOW
RWM vs. UDOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) and ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RWM | UDOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.23 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 1.71 | -2.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 6.05 | -7.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RWM vs. UDOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWM drawdown since its inception was -95.61%, which is greater than UDOW's maximum drawdown of -80.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWM and UDOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWM | UDOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.61% | -80.29% | -15.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.57% | -28.07% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.12% | -44.83% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.12% | -55.79% | +12.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.51% | -80.29% | +7.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.53% | -2.61% | -92.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.14% | -14.31% | -59.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.00% | 7.90% | +8.10% |
Volatility
RWM vs. UDOW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) is 4.85%, while ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that RWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UDOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWM | UDOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | 10.90% | -6.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.16% | 28.81% | -14.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.43% | 36.73% | -17.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.60% | 44.29% | -21.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.08% | 51.68% | -28.60% |
RWM vs. UDOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RWM and UDOW have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
RWM vs. UDOW - Dividend Comparison
RWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than UDOW's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWM ProShares Short Russell2000 | 3.81% | 3.97% | 6.03% | 4.78% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 1.55% | 0.87% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UDOW ProShares UltraPro Dow30 | 1.09% | 1.38% | 0.95% | 0.95% | 0.83% | 0.26% | 0.19% | 0.61% | 0.73% | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RWM and UDOW have a correlation of -0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UDOW has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to RWM (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWM dropped -95.61% vs UDOW's -80.29%.
On 10-year performance, UDOW leads with 23.46% vs -11.71% for RWM. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, RWM has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UDOW has performed better with a 23.46% return vs -11.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RWM and UDOW have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
RWM has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 1.09% for UDOW.
RWM is categorized as Inverse Equities, while UDOW is Leveraged Equities. RWM tracks Russell 2000 (-100%), while UDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average (300%).
UDOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RWM and UDOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer