PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RWM vs. SPYG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RWM and SPYG is -0.80. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


-0.50.00.51.0-0.8

Performance

RWM vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-89.48%
723.37%
RWM
SPYG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RWM:

-0.41

SPYG:

2.25

Sortino Ratio

RWM:

-0.45

SPYG:

2.89

Omega Ratio

RWM:

0.95

SPYG:

1.41

Calmar Ratio

RWM:

-0.09

SPYG:

3.08

Martin Ratio

RWM:

-0.91

SPYG:

12.14

Ulcer Index

RWM:

9.35%

SPYG:

3.24%

Daily Std Dev

RWM:

20.83%

SPYG:

17.49%

Max Drawdown

RWM:

-94.64%

SPYG:

-67.79%

Current Drawdown

RWM:

-94.16%

SPYG:

-2.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWM achieves a -6.61% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 37.65% return. Over the past 10 years, RWM has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of -10.18%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.23% annualized return.


RWM

YTD

-6.61%

1M

3.96%

6M

-8.87%

1Y

-6.92%

5Y*

-10.92%

10Y*

-10.18%

SPYG

YTD

37.65%

1M

3.29%

6M

11.66%

1Y

37.77%

5Y*

17.47%

10Y*

15.23%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RWM vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.


RWM
ProShares Short Russell2000
Expense ratio chart for RWM: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%
Expense ratio chart for SPYG: current value at 0.04% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.04%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RWM vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RWM, currently valued at -0.41, compared to the broader market0.002.004.00-0.412.25
The chart of Sortino ratio for RWM, currently valued at -0.45, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.00-0.452.89
The chart of Omega ratio for RWM, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.000.951.41
The chart of Calmar ratio for RWM, currently valued at -0.09, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.093.08
The chart of Martin ratio for RWM, currently valued at -0.91, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00-0.9112.14
RWM
SPYG

The current RWM Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWM and SPYG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-0.41
2.25
RWM
SPYG

Dividends

RWM vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

RWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than SPYG's 0.40% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
RWM
ProShares Short Russell2000
4.40%4.78%0.39%0.00%0.20%1.55%0.87%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYG
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.40%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.36%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%1.37%1.42%

Drawdowns

RWM vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWM drawdown since its inception was -94.64%, which is greater than SPYG's maximum drawdown of -67.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWM and SPYG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-94.16%
-2.45%
RWM
SPYG

Volatility

RWM vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 4.80%. This indicates that RWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
5.99%
4.80%
RWM
SPYG
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab