RWK vs. AVUV
RWK (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF) and AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RWK is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index, while AVUV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. RWK is passively managed, while AVUV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RWK returned 10.78%/yr vs 10.93%/yr for AVUV. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RWK charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AVUV.
Performance
RWK vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWK achieves a 13.73% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 19.12% return.
RWK
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 3.22%
- YTD
- 13.73%
- 6M
- 14.17%
- 1Y
- 30.18%
- 3Y*
- 18.14%
- 5Y*
- 10.78%
- 10Y*
- 12.83%
AVUV
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 19.12%
- 6M
- 20.66%
- 1Y
- 39.89%
- 3Y*
- 19.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.93%
- 10Y*
- —
RWK vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF | 13.73% | 10.27% | 11.94% | 23.76% | -8.19% | 34.31% | 11.06% | 10.22% |
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 19.12% | 7.44% | 9.28% | 22.82% | -4.91% | 42.20% | 6.43% | 8.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWK and AVUV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between RWK and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
RWK vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RWK
AVUV
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
RWK
AVUV
Consumer Cyclical
RWK
AVUV
Technology
RWK
AVUV
Financial Services
RWK
AVUV
Consumer Defensive
RWK
AVUV
Energy
RWK
AVUV
Basic Materials
RWK
AVUV
Healthcare
RWK
AVUV
Real Estate
RWK
AVUV
Utilities
RWK
AVUV
Communication Services
RWK
AVUV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWK vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank
RWK
AVUV
RWK vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RWK | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.82 | 2.29 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.70 | 3.26 | -0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.40 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 4.99 | -2.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.44 | 14.84 | -6.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RWK | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 2.29 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.48 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.56 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
RWK vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWK drawdown since its inception was -56.49%, which is greater than AVUV's maximum drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWK and AVUV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWK | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.49% | -49.42% | -7.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.14% | -7.95% | -3.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.58% | -28.79% | +4.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.58% | -28.79% | +4.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.15% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.56% | -7.96% | +0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 2.67% | +0.79% |
Volatility
RWK vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.14%. This indicates that RWK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWK | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 4.14% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.87% | 11.28% | +0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.72% | 17.50% | -0.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.13% | 22.73% | -1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.96% | 28.30% | -5.34% |
RWK vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWK has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
RWK vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison
RWK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than AVUV's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.28% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.21% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF | 1.12% | 1.25% | 1.11% | 1.05% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 0.96% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 0.99% | 1.30% | 0.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, RWK and AVUV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
RWK has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to AVUV (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWK dropped -56.49% vs AVUV's -49.42%.
On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 10.93% vs 10.78% for RWK. On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 10.93% return vs 10.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RWK.
AVUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.12% for RWK.
RWK is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RWK and 0.25% for AVUV.
AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RWK and AVUV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer