PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RVPH vs. IESC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RVPH vs. IESC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reviva Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc. (RVPH) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RVPH achieves a -89.37% return, which is significantly lower than IESC's 86.22% return.


RVPH

1D
-0.29%
1M
-29.64%
YTD
-89.37%
6M
-95.01%
1Y
-96.36%
3Y*
-83.64%
5Y*
-64.08%
10Y*

IESC

1D
2.77%
1M
15.65%
YTD
86.22%
6M
72.76%
1Y
166.54%
3Y*
142.30%
5Y*
67.69%
10Y*
47.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RVPH vs. IESC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RVPH
Reviva Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc.
-89.37%-84.59%-64.85%21.18%47.06%-66.95%-16.40%6.19%1.44%
IESC
IES Holdings, Inc.
86.22%93.58%153.67%122.72%-29.76%9.99%79.42%65.02%-13.32%

Correlation

The correlation between RVPH and IESC is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2018

0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RVPH:

$4.17M

IESC:

$14.62B

EPS

RVPH:

-$4.74M

IESC:

$18.85

PB Ratio

RVPH:

0.24

IESC:

13.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

RVPH:

$0.00

IESC:

$3.63B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RVPH:

$0.00

IESC:

$931.31M

EBITDA (TTM)

RVPH:

-$20.20T

IESC:

$487.14M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RVPH vs. IESC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RVPH
RVPH Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
RVPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RVPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
RVPH Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
RVPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
RVPH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

IESC
IESC Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
IESC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IESC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IESC Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
IESC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IESC Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RVPH vs. IESC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reviva Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc. (RVPH) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RVPHIESCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.39

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.98

7.69

-8.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.53

21.83

-23.36

RVPH vs. IESC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RVPH Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the IESC Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RVPH and IESC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RVPHIESCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.56

2.71

-3.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.50

1.26

-1.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.47

0.05

-0.52

Drawdowns

RVPH vs. IESC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RVPH drawdown since its inception was -99.86%, roughly equal to the maximum IESC drawdown of -98.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVPH and IESC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RVPHIESCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.86%

-98.32%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-98.03%

-21.80%

-76.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.77%

-49.23%

-50.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.81%

-54.28%

-45.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.75%

0.00%

-99.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.48%

-55.03%

-0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

62.95%

7.66%

+55.29%

Volatility

RVPH vs. IESC - Volatility Comparison

Reviva Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc. (RVPH) has a higher volatility of 98.55% compared to IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) at 12.25%. This indicates that RVPH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IESC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RVPHIESCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

98.55%

12.25%

+86.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

155.29%

49.68%

+105.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

171.84%

61.92%

+109.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

129.33%

53.91%

+75.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

114.09%

48.10%

+65.99%

Dividends

RVPH vs. IESC - Dividend Comparison

Neither RVPH nor IESC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

RVPH vs. IESC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Reviva Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc. and IES Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B202220232024202520260
974.20M
(RVPH) Total Revenue
(IESC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RVPH and IESC have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RVPH has higher volatility (98.55%) compared to IESC (12.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RVPH dropped -99.86% vs IESC's -98.32%.

IESC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RVPH and IESC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer