RUN vs. NOVA

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

RUN (Sunrun Inc.) and NOVA (Sunnova Energy International Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Solar industry within the Technology sector.

Performance

RUN vs. NOVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sunrun Inc. (RUN) and Sunnova Energy International Inc. (NOVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RUN

• 1D: 3.05%
• 1M: -23.00%
• 6M: -48.37%
• YTD: -46.68%
• 1Y: -0.41%
• 3Y*: -19.99%
• 5Y*: -28.63%
• 10Y*: 6.97%
• ALL TIME*: -2.57%

NOVA

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RUN Sunrun Inc.	$95.39M	$113.39M	$130.32M

RUN vs. NOVA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RUN Sunrun Inc.	-48.29%
NOVA Sunnova Energy International Inc.	0.00%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) RUN : $3.17B NOVA : $839.92M
Gross Profit (TTM) RUN : $746.75M NOVA : $376.96M
EBITDA (TTM) RUN : $544.21M NOVA : $156.33M

Return for Risk

RUN vs. NOVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RUN

RUN Risk / Return Rank: 45
RUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
RUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
RUN Omega Ratio Rank: 50
RUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
RUN Martin Ratio Rank: 42

NOVA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RUN vs. NOVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sunrun Inc. (RUN) and Sunnova Energy International Inc. (NOVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RUN	NOVA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.05	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.63	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.08	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.16	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	RUN	NOVA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-73.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-90.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-94.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-89.83%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-54.99%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.38%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RUN	NOVA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.32%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	65.29%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	91.45%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	90.64%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	78.45%	—	—

Dividends

RUN vs. NOVA - Dividend Comparison

Neither RUN nor NOVA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials