PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RUN vs. ENPH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RUN vs. ENPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sunrun Inc. (RUN) and Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RUN achieves a -46.68% return, which is significantly lower than ENPH's 17.13% return. Over the past 10 years, RUN has underperformed ENPH with an annualized return of 6.97%, while ENPH has yielded a comparatively higher 35.57% annualized return.


RUN

1D
3.05%
1M
-23.00%
6M
-48.37%
YTD
-46.68%
1Y
-0.41%
3Y*
-19.99%
5Y*
-28.63%
10Y*
6.97%
ALL TIME*
-2.57%

ENPH

1D
0.43%
1M
-12.84%
6M
1.51%
YTD
17.13%
1Y
19.44%
3Y*
-37.03%
5Y*
-27.67%
10Y*
35.57%
ALL TIME*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$194.87M$189.47M$367.78M
$95.39M$113.39M$130.32M

RUN vs. ENPH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RUN
Sunrun Inc.
-46.68%98.92%-52.88%-18.28%-29.97%-50.56%402.39%26.81%84.58%11.11%
ENPH
Enphase Energy, Inc.
17.13%-53.33%-48.02%-50.13%44.83%4.26%571.53%452.43%96.27%138.61%

Correlation

The correlation between RUN and ENPH is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2015

0.57

The correlation between RUN and ENPH shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RUN:

$2.34B

ENPH:

$4.96B

EPS

RUN:

$2.10

ENPH:

$1.01

PE Ratio

RUN:

4.67

ENPH:

37.15

PEG Ratio

RUN:

0.02

ENPH:

0.85

PS Ratio

RUN:

0.84

ENPH:

3.75

PB Ratio

RUN:

0.80

ENPH:

4.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

RUN:

$3.17B

ENPH:

$1.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RUN:

$746.75M

ENPH:

$623.68M

EBITDA (TTM)

RUN:

$544.21M

ENPH:

$203.83M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RUN vs. ENPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RUN
RUN Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
RUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
RUN Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
RUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
RUN Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

ENPH
ENPH Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ENPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENPH Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ENPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENPH Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RUN vs. ENPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sunrun Inc. (RUN) and Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RUNENPHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.11

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.08

0.31

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.16

0.69

-0.85

RUN vs. ENPH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RUN Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the ENPH Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RUN and ENPH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RUN vs. ENPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RUN drawdown since its inception was -94.13%, roughly equal to the maximum ENPH drawdown of -95.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RUN and ENPH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RUNENPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.13%

-95.97%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.77%

-51.51%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.65%

-81.34%

+7.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.34%

-92.23%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.13%

-92.23%

-1.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.83%

-88.83%

-1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.99%

-50.90%

-4.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.38%

23.12%

+4.26%

Volatility

RUN vs. ENPH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sunrun Inc. (RUN) is 13.32%, while Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) has a volatility of 18.66%. This indicates that RUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENPH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RUNENPHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.32%

18.66%

-5.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

65.29%

68.82%

-3.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

91.45%

82.81%

+8.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.64%

70.68%

+19.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.45%

78.42%

+0.03%

Dividends

RUN vs. ENPH - Dividend Comparison

Neither RUN nor ENPH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

RUN vs. ENPH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sunrun Inc. and Enphase Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

RUN vs. ENPH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sunrun Inc. and Enphase Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

RUN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sunrun Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 722.23M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ENPH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Enphase Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 175.01M and revenue of 291.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.0%.

RUN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sunrun Inc. reported an operating income of -43.51M and revenue of 722.23M, resulting in an operating margin of -6.0%.

ENPH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Enphase Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 51.52M and revenue of 291.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.

RUN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sunrun Inc. reported a net income of 167.64M and revenue of 722.23M, resulting in a net margin of 23.2%.

ENPH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Enphase Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 36.08M and revenue of 291.85M, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RUN and ENPH have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ENPH has higher volatility (18.66%) compared to RUN (13.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RUN dropped -94.13% vs ENPH's -95.97%.

ENPH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RUN and ENPH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer