RUBUSD=X vs. LTC

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about RUB/USD (RUBUSD=X) and LTC Properties, Inc. (LTC).

Performance

RUBUSD=X vs. LTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RUB/USD (RUBUSD=X) and LTC Properties, Inc. (LTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RUBUSD=X vs. LTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RUBUSD=X RUB/USD	-1.51%	39.10%	-18.63%	-17.52%	1.88%	-1.48%	-16.36%	11.83%	-16.60%	6.18%
LTC LTC Properties, Inc.	13.43%	6.17%	14.94%	-3.25%	10.52%	-6.77%	-7.56%	12.79%	1.12%	-2.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RUBUSD=X achieves a -1.51% return, which is significantly lower than LTC's 13.43% return. Over the past 10 years, RUBUSD=X has underperformed LTC with an annualized return of -1.55%, while LTC has yielded a comparatively higher 4.08% annualized return.

RUBUSD=X

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -3.19%
• YTD: -1.51%
• 6M: 2.93%
• 1Y: 5.06%
• 3Y*: -1.07%
• 5Y*: -0.94%
• 10Y*: -1.55%

LTC

• 1D: 2.29%
• 1M: -2.20%
• YTD: 13.43%
• 6M: 8.74%
• 1Y: 15.88%
• 3Y*: 11.33%
• 5Y*: 4.19%
• 10Y*: 4.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RUBUSD=X vs. LTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RUBUSD=X

RUBUSD=X Risk / Return Rank: 52
RUBUSD=X Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
RUBUSD=X Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
RUBUSD=X Omega Ratio Rank: 54
RUBUSD=X Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
RUBUSD=X Martin Ratio Rank: 50

LTC

LTC Risk / Return Rank: 66
LTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
LTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
LTC Omega Ratio Rank: 59
LTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
LTC Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RUBUSD=X vs. LTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RUB/USD (RUBUSD=X) and LTC Properties, Inc. (LTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RUBUSD=X	LTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.23	0.87	-0.64
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.48	1.27	-0.80
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.16	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.02	1.60	-1.62
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.03	4.39	-4.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RUBUSD=X vs. LTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RUBUSD=X Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the LTC Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RUBUSD=X and LTC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RUBUSD=X	LTC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23	0.87	-0.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02	0.20	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.05	0.15	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.23	0.36	-0.59

Correlation

The correlation between RUBUSD=X and LTC is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Drawdowns

RUBUSD=X vs. LTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RUBUSD=X drawdown since its inception was -83.48%, roughly equal to the maximum LTC drawdown of -80.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RUBUSD=X and LTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	RUBUSD=X	LTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.48%	-80.13%	-3.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.08%	-9.46%	-4.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.91%	-27.80%	-26.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-60.21%	-51.41%	-8.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-71.23%	-4.33%	-66.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.02%	-16.03%	-32.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.16%	3.45%	+3.71%

Volatility

RUBUSD=X vs. LTC - Volatility Comparison

RUB/USD (RUBUSD=X) has a higher volatility of 7.27% compared to LTC Properties, Inc. (LTC) at 6.44%. This indicates that RUBUSD=X's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RUBUSD=X	LTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.27%	6.44%	+0.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.22%	13.40%	-2.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.59%	18.27%	-0.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.85%	20.85%	+19.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.09%	27.02%	+3.07%