RTM vs. XLC
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RTM) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC).
RTM and XLC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RTM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Materials -SEC. It was launched on Nov 1, 2006. XLC is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index. It was launched on Jun 18, 2018. Both RTM and XLC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RTM or XLC.
Key characteristics
| RTM | XLC | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.13% | 7.45% |
| 1Y Return | 9.79% | 31.22% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.47% | 0.83% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.43% | 10.43% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.60 | 1.86 |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.36% | 16.74% |
| Max Drawdown | -57.93% | -46.66% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.29% | -7.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between RTM and XLC is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
RTM vs. XLC - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, RTM achieves a 3.13% return, which is significantly lower than XLC's 7.45% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RTM vs. XLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLC's 0.13% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RTM vs. XLC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RTM) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RTM vs. XLC - Dividend Comparison
RTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than XLC's 0.85% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTM Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF | 1.99% | 2.05% | 2.19% | 1.43% | 1.57% | 1.81% | 1.83% | 1.50% | 1.28% | 1.57% | 1.45% | 1.36% |
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.85% | 0.82% | 1.10% | 0.74% | 0.68% | 0.82% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RTM vs. XLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTM drawdown since its inception was -57.93%, which is greater than XLC's maximum drawdown of -46.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTM and XLC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RTM vs. XLC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RTM) is 4.33%, while Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that RTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.