RTM vs. FXZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RTM) and First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ).
RTM and FXZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RTM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Materials -SEC. It was launched on Nov 1, 2006. FXZ is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the StrataQuant Materials Index. It was launched on May 8, 2007. Both RTM and FXZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RTM or FXZ.
Key characteristics
| RTM | FXZ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 7.72% | -6.05% |
| 1Y Return | 21.85% | 8.37% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.89% | 2.07% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.86% | 12.16% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 9.19% | 8.81% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.38 | 0.42 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.99 | 0.72 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.24 | 1.09 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.35 | 0.48 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.85 | 1.17 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.12% | 6.86% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.49% | 19.05% |
| Max Drawdown | -84.51% | -65.46% |
| Current Drawdown | -51.95% | -10.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between RTM and FXZ is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
RTM vs. FXZ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, RTM achieves a 7.72% return, which is significantly higher than FXZ's -6.05% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RTM having a 9.19% annualized return and FXZ not far behind at 8.81%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RTM vs. FXZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FXZ's 0.67% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RTM vs. FXZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RTM) and First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RTM vs. FXZ - Dividend Comparison
RTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than FXZ's 1.56% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTM Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF | 1.90% | 2.05% | 2.19% | 1.43% | 1.57% | 1.81% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.45% | 1.36% |
FXZ First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund | 1.56% | 1.97% | 1.56% | 1.11% | 1.51% | 1.58% | 1.38% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.26% | 1.73% | 0.90% |
Drawdowns
RTM vs. FXZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTM drawdown since its inception was -84.51%, which is greater than FXZ's maximum drawdown of -65.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTM and FXZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RTM vs. FXZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RTM) is 3.92%, while First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that RTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.