RTM vs. DBC
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RTM) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC).
RTM and DBC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RTM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Materials -SEC. It was launched on Nov 1, 2006. DBC is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. It was launched on Feb 3, 2006. Both RTM and DBC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RTM or DBC.
Correlation
The correlation between RTM and DBC is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
RTM vs. DBC - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
RTM:
-0.46
DBC:
-0.24
RTM:
-0.49
DBC:
-0.21
RTM:
0.94
DBC:
0.98
RTM:
-0.11
DBC:
-0.07
RTM:
-0.96
DBC:
-0.60
RTM:
9.50%
DBC:
6.01%
RTM:
21.38%
DBC:
16.10%
RTM:
-86.87%
DBC:
-76.36%
RTM:
-82.46%
DBC:
-46.79%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTM achieves a -1.04% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's -0.56% return. Over the past 10 years, RTM has outperformed DBC with an annualized return of 7.30%, while DBC has yielded a comparatively lower 2.81% annualized return.
RTM
-1.04%
8.94%
-11.36%
-9.83%
14.32%
7.30%
DBC
-0.56%
1.58%
1.15%
-3.80%
16.82%
2.81%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RTM vs. DBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DBC's 0.85% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RTM vs. DBC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
RTM
DBC
RTM vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RTM) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
RTM vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison
RTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than DBC's 5.25% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTM Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF | 1.10% | 0.53% | 2.05% | 0.44% | 0.29% | 1.57% | 1.81% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.45% |
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 5.25% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RTM vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTM drawdown since its inception was -86.87%, which is greater than DBC's maximum drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTM and DBC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
RTM vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RTM) has a higher volatility of 6.48% compared to Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) at 4.51%. This indicates that RTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...