RTH vs. WANT
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) and Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT).
RTH and WANT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RTH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. WANT is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index (-300%). It was launched on Nov 29, 2018. Both RTH and WANT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RTH or WANT.
Correlation
The correlation between RTH and WANT is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
RTH vs. WANT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RTH:
0.77
WANT:
0.16
RTH:
1.16
WANT:
0.64
RTH:
1.14
WANT:
1.08
RTH:
1.03
WANT:
0.13
RTH:
3.24
WANT:
0.54
RTH:
3.23%
WANT:
18.48%
RTH:
13.60%
WANT:
61.09%
RTH:
-41.80%
WANT:
-85.89%
RTH:
-5.25%
WANT:
-63.88%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTH achieves a 2.42% return, which is significantly higher than WANT's -30.25% return.
RTH
2.42%
-1.26%
6.27%
11.56%
18.72%
12.86%
WANT
-30.25%
-14.56%
-3.58%
15.21%
28.72%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RTH vs. WANT - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than WANT's 0.98% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RTH vs. WANT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
RTH
WANT
RTH vs. WANT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) and Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RTH vs. WANT - Dividend Comparison
RTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than WANT's 1.01% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 0.75% | 0.77% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% | 0.41% |
WANT Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares | 1.01% | 0.60% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RTH vs. WANT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTH drawdown since its inception was -41.80%, smaller than the maximum WANT drawdown of -85.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTH and WANT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RTH vs. WANT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) is 5.71%, while Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) has a volatility of 25.93%. This indicates that RTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WANT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.