RTH vs. SPY
RTH (VanEck Vectors Retail ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RTH is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RTH returned 13.87%/yr vs 15.49%/yr for SPY. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RTH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
RTH vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTH achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, RTH has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 13.87%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.49% annualized return.
RTH
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -4.91%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 7.77%
- 3Y*
- 16.09%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 13.87%
SPY
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
RTH vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 1.87% | 12.36% | 20.02% | 20.07% | -17.67% | 24.94% | 31.62% | 29.06% | 3.87% | 22.45% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between RTH and SPY is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2001 | 0.77 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RTH and SPY has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
RTH vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RTH
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
RTH
SPY
Consumer Defensive
RTH
SPY
Healthcare
RTH
SPY
Industrials
RTH
SPY
Basic Materials
RTH
-
SPY
Communication Services
RTH
-
SPY
Energy
RTH
-
SPY
Financial Services
RTH
-
SPY
Real Estate
RTH
-
SPY
Technology
RTH
-
SPY
Utilities
RTH
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RTH vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
RTH
SPY
RTH vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RTH | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | 2.38 | -1.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.04 | 3.24 | -2.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.43 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 3.16 | -2.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.46 | 14.72 | -11.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RTH | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 2.38 | -1.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.82 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 0.87 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.59 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
RTH vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTH drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTH and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RTH | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.32% | -55.19% | +12.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.83% | -8.88% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.80% | -18.76% | +4.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.00% | -24.50% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.00% | -33.72% | +8.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.85% | -0.70% | -5.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.34% | -9.05% | +1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 1.91% | +0.35% |
Volatility
RTH vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.84%. This indicates that RTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RTH | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | 2.84% | +0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.22% | 8.90% | +0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.07% | 11.83% | +0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.81% | 17.05% | -0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 17.94% | -0.40% |
RTH vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
RTH vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
RTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than SPY's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 0.95% | 0.97% | 0.77% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RTH and SPY have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RTH has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTH dropped -42.32% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.49% vs 13.87% for RTH. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.49% return vs 13.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RTH.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.95% for RTH.
RTH is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. RTH tracks MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RTH and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RTH and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer