RTH vs. RETL
RTH (VanEck Vectors Retail ETF) and RETL (Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - RTH is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index, while RETL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Retail Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RTH returned 14.09%/yr vs -4.35%/yr for RETL. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RTH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for RETL.
Performance
RTH vs. RETL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTH achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly higher than RETL's -7.88% return. Over the past 10 years, RTH has outperformed RETL with an annualized return of 14.09%, while RETL has yielded a comparatively lower -4.35% annualized return.
RTH
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -3.91%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 10.08%
- 3Y*
- 14.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.91%
- 10Y*
- 14.09%
RETL
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- 9.86%
- YTD
- -7.88%
- 6M
- -13.95%
- 1Y
- 12.74%
- 3Y*
- 10.62%
- 5Y*
- -28.37%
- 10Y*
- -4.35%
RTH vs. RETL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 1.55% | 12.36% | 20.02% | 20.07% | -17.67% | 24.94% | 31.62% | 29.06% | 3.87% | 22.45% |
RETL Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares | -7.88% | -5.98% | 9.59% | 33.62% | -80.80% | 101.03% | 63.63% | 23.41% | -35.21% | -1.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between RTH and RETL is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2010 | 0.77 |
The correlation between RTH and RETL shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RTH vs. RETL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RTH
RETL
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
RTH
RETL
Consumer Defensive
RTH
RETL
Healthcare
RTH
RETL
Industrials
RTH
RETL
-
Basic Materials
RTH
-
RETL
-
Communication Services
RTH
-
RETL
Energy
RTH
-
RETL
Financial Services
RTH
-
RETL
-
Real Estate
RTH
-
RETL
-
Technology
RTH
-
RETL
Utilities
RTH
-
RETL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RTH vs. RETL — Risk / Return Rank
RTH
RETL
RTH vs. RETL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) and Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RTH | RETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.09 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 0.34 | +0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.15 | 0.68 | +3.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RTH vs. RETL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTH drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, smaller than the maximum RETL drawdown of -92.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTH and RETL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RTH | RETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.32% | -92.00% | +49.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.83% | -38.08% | +30.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.80% | -62.72% | +48.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.00% | -92.00% | +67.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.00% | -92.00% | +67.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.15% | -84.18% | +78.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.33% | -37.68% | +30.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 18.81% | -16.37% |
Volatility
RTH vs. RETL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) is 4.52%, while Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) has a volatility of 18.98%. This indicates that RTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RETL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RTH | RETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 18.98% | -14.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.69% | 42.32% | -32.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.41% | 60.87% | -48.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 79.56% | -62.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 79.92% | -62.34% |
RTH vs. RETL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RETL's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
RTH vs. RETL - Dividend Comparison
RTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than RETL's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RETL Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares | 0.55% | 0.58% | 1.13% | 1.35% | 0.71% | 0.22% | 0.19% | 0.92% | 1.19% | 0.01% | 2.60% | 0.00% |
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 0.96% | 0.97% | 0.77% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RTH and RETL have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RETL has higher volatility (18.98%) compared to RTH (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTH dropped -42.32% vs RETL's -92.00%.
On 10-year performance, RTH leads with 14.09% vs -4.35% for RETL. On fees, RTH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RTH has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RTH has performed better with a 14.09% return vs -4.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RTH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RETL.
RTH has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.55% for RETL.
RTH is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while RETL is Leveraged Equities. RTH tracks MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index, while RETL tracks Russell 1000 Retail Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RTH and 0.99% for RETL.
RTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RTH and RETL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer