PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RSST vs. ET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RSST vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.12%
27.95%
RSST
ET

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSST achieves a 18.46% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 49.01% return.


RSST

YTD

18.46%

1M

-0.21%

6M

0.13%

1Y

22.24%

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

ET

YTD

49.01%

1M

18.00%

6M

27.95%

1Y

49.66%

5Y (annualized)

20.30%

10Y (annualized)

3.02%

Key characteristics


RSSTET
Sharpe Ratio1.013.09
Sortino Ratio1.444.39
Omega Ratio1.181.56
Calmar Ratio1.282.20
Martin Ratio3.5226.18
Ulcer Index6.59%1.91%
Daily Std Dev23.01%16.20%
Max Drawdown-18.16%-87.81%
Current Drawdown-8.66%0.00%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between RSST and ET is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RSST vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RSST, currently valued at 1.01, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.013.09
The chart of Sortino ratio for RSST, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.444.39
The chart of Omega ratio for RSST, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.181.56
The chart of Calmar ratio for RSST, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.288.15
The chart of Martin ratio for RSST, currently valued at 3.52, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.003.5226.18
RSST
ET

The current RSST Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSST and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00Sep 15Sep 22Sep 29Oct 06Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 03Nov 10Nov 17
1.01
3.09
RSST
ET

Dividends

RSST vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

RSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than ET's 6.73% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
RSST
Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF
0.79%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
6.73%8.96%7.33%7.44%17.28%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%3.19%

Drawdowns

RSST vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSST drawdown since its inception was -18.16%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSST and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-8.66%
0
RSST
ET

Volatility

RSST vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 5.64%. This indicates that RSST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.14%
5.64%
RSST
ET