PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPU vs. ES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPU vs. ES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and Eversource Energy (ES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPU achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly higher than ES's 7.87% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPU has outperformed ES with an annualized return of 9.73%, while ES has yielded a comparatively lower 5.81% annualized return.


RSPU

1D
0.98%
1M
0.63%
YTD
8.91%
6M
9.36%
1Y
16.62%
3Y*
16.87%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
9.73%

ES

1D
1.30%
1M
1.47%
YTD
7.87%
6M
9.44%
1Y
17.22%
3Y*
5.34%
5Y*
1.80%
10Y*
5.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPU vs. ES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
8.91%16.82%23.57%-3.45%4.37%17.13%-2.70%22.94%6.89%9.43%
ES
Eversource Energy
7.87%22.86%-2.46%-23.43%-5.06%8.18%4.45%34.49%6.41%17.97%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPU and ES is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006

0.74

The correlation between RSPU and ES shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.80 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPU vs. ES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPU
RSPU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
RSPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPU Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPU Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

ES
ES Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ES Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ES Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
ES Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ES Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPU vs. ES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and Eversource Energy (ES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPUESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.15

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

1.14

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.36

2.73

+1.64

RSPU vs. ES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPU Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the ES Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPU and ES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPU vs. ES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPU drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, smaller than the maximum ES drawdown of -73.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPU and ES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPUESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.08%

-73.04%

+24.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.46%

-15.13%

+6.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.27%

-28.65%

+12.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.86%

-41.69%

+19.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.85%

-41.69%

+4.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.54%

-10.37%

+6.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.84%

-19.06%

+11.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

6.32%

-2.50%

Volatility

RSPU vs. ES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) is 4.98%, while Eversource Energy (ES) has a volatility of 7.03%. This indicates that RSPU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPUESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.98%

7.03%

-2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.20%

16.08%

-4.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.13%

24.61%

-10.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.90%

23.88%

-6.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.12%

24.37%

-5.25%

Dividends

RSPU vs. ES - Dividend Comparison

RSPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than ES's 4.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ES
Eversource Energy
4.34%4.47%4.98%4.37%3.04%2.65%2.62%2.52%3.11%3.01%3.22%3.27%
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
2.52%2.54%2.39%2.92%2.35%2.41%2.94%2.54%3.11%3.08%2.98%4.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPU and ES have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ES has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to RSPU (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPU dropped -48.08% vs ES's -73.04%.

RSPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPU and ES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer