RSPT vs. XLG
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG).
RSPT and XLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSPT is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500® Information Technology Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2006. XLG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell Top 50 Index. It was launched on May 10, 2005. Both RSPT and XLG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RSPT or XLG.
Key characteristics
| RSPT | XLG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 18.12% | 32.48% |
| 1Y Return | 31.28% | 38.33% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.05% | 12.32% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 15.91% | 18.62% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 16.95% | 15.13% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.83 | 2.76 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.44 | 3.59 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.31 | 1.51 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.76 | 3.58 |
| Martin Ratio | 8.91 | 14.90 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.98% | 2.72% |
| Daily Std Dev | 19.37% | 14.68% |
| Max Drawdown | -58.91% | -52.39% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.44% | -0.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPT and XLG is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
RSPT vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, RSPT achieves a 18.12% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 32.48% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPT has outperformed XLG with an annualized return of 16.95%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively lower 15.13% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSPT vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RSPT vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RSPT vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
RSPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than XLG's 0.72% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.71% | 0.50% | 1.29% | 0.92% | 0.98% | 0.84% | 1.16% | 1.18% | 1.16% | 0.80% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% | 1.97% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
RSPT vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPT drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than XLG's maximum drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPT and XLG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RSPT vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) has a higher volatility of 5.70% compared to Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 4.49%. This indicates that RSPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.