PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPT vs. FTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPT vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPT achieves a 37.17% return, which is significantly higher than FTEC's 23.56% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPT has underperformed FTEC with an annualized return of 22.05%, while FTEC has yielded a comparatively higher 25.28% annualized return.


RSPT

1D
-3.45%
1M
2.35%
YTD
37.17%
6M
34.77%
1Y
59.82%
3Y*
30.81%
5Y*
17.50%
10Y*
22.05%

FTEC

1D
-3.70%
1M
0.35%
YTD
23.56%
6M
21.69%
1Y
47.58%
3Y*
30.58%
5Y*
19.77%
10Y*
25.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPT vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
37.17%22.15%15.16%35.18%-24.50%28.53%30.21%42.07%-0.61%32.98%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
23.56%22.11%29.40%53.30%-29.59%30.49%45.83%48.93%-0.39%36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPT and FTEC is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.93

The correlation between RSPT and FTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSPT vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPT
FTEC

Technology

97.6%
98.3%

Energy

1.4%
0.3%

Industrials

0.9%
0.6%

Financial Services

0.0%
0.6%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Communication Services

-

0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

RSPT
97.6%
FTEC
98.3%

Energy

RSPT
1.4%
FTEC
0.3%

Industrials

RSPT
0.9%
FTEC
0.6%

Financial Services

RSPT
0.0%
FTEC
0.6%

Basic Materials

RSPT

-

FTEC
0.0%

Communication Services

RSPT

-

FTEC
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

RSPT

-

FTEC
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

RSPT

-

FTEC

-

Healthcare

RSPT

-

FTEC

-

Real Estate

RSPT

-

FTEC

-

Utilities

RSPT

-

FTEC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPT vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPT
RSPT Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
RSPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPT Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FTEC
FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPT vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPTFTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.35

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.24

2.94

+2.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.83

9.03

+8.80

RSPT vs. FTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPT Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the FTEC Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPT and FTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPT vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPT drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPT and FTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPTFTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.91%

-34.95%

-23.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.47%

-16.26%

+4.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.62%

-27.30%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.49%

-34.95%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.67%

-34.95%

+1.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.58%

-7.72%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.89%

-5.57%

-3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

5.28%

-1.92%

Volatility

RSPT vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) has a higher volatility of 12.54% compared to Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) at 11.42%. This indicates that RSPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPTFTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.54%

11.42%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.81%

18.65%

+1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.79%

22.79%

+1.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.52%

25.60%

-1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.94%

24.86%

-0.92%

RSPT vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPT vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

RSPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than FTEC's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.36%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%
RSPT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
0.26%0.39%0.44%0.56%0.71%0.50%1.29%0.92%0.98%0.84%1.16%1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPT and FTEC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSPT has higher volatility (12.54%) compared to FTEC (11.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPT dropped -58.91% vs FTEC's -34.95%.

On 10-year performance, FTEC leads with 25.28% vs 22.05% for RSPT. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FTEC has been the lower-risk option at 11.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 25.28% return vs 22.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPT.

FTEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.26% for RSPT.

RSPT tracks S&P 500® Information Technology Index, while FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPT and 0.08% for FTEC.

RSPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPT and FTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer