RSPS vs. PSCC
RSPS (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF) and PSCC (Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds from Invesco - RSPS tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC while PSCC tracks the S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPS returned 4.43%/yr vs 6.95%/yr for PSCC. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSPS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PSCC.
Performance
RSPS vs. PSCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPS achieves a 4.59% return, which is significantly lower than PSCC's 13.60% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPS has underperformed PSCC with an annualized return of 4.43%, while PSCC has yielded a comparatively higher 6.95% annualized return.
RSPS
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 4.59%
- 6M
- 4.86%
- 1Y
- 2.06%
- 3Y*
- -0.85%
- 5Y*
- 1.44%
- 10Y*
- 4.43%
PSCC
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- 6.59%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 6M
- 11.94%
- 1Y
- 5.58%
- 3Y*
- 1.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.40%
- 10Y*
- 6.95%
RSPS vs. PSCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 4.59% | -0.88% | -1.47% | -5.39% | 2.88% | 14.68% | 6.19% | 28.17% | -10.86% | 14.20% |
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 13.60% | -16.47% | 0.98% | 14.83% | -6.66% | 28.82% | 11.17% | 17.39% | -6.72% | 9.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPS and PSCC is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010 | 0.63 |
The correlation between RSPS and PSCC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
RSPS vs. PSCC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPS
PSCC
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
RSPS
PSCC
Consumer Cyclical
RSPS
PSCC
Financial Services
RSPS
PSCC
Basic Materials
RSPS
-
PSCC
Communication Services
RSPS
-
PSCC
-
Energy
RSPS
-
PSCC
-
Healthcare
RSPS
-
PSCC
-
Industrials
RSPS
-
PSCC
Real Estate
RSPS
-
PSCC
-
Technology
RSPS
-
PSCC
-
Utilities
RSPS
-
PSCC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPS vs. PSCC — Risk / Return Rank
RSPS
PSCC
RSPS vs. PSCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPS | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.07 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | 0.37 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.32 | 0.64 | -0.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPS vs. PSCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPS drawdown since its inception was -35.93%, which is greater than PSCC's maximum drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPS and PSCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPS | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.93% | -33.61% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.72% | -15.17% | +3.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.53% | -23.36% | +6.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.61% | -23.36% | +4.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.42% | -33.61% | +8.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.68% | -11.31% | +2.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.06% | -5.99% | +0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.43% | 8.69% | -2.26% |
Volatility
RSPS vs. PSCC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) is 5.30%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that RSPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPS | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.30% | 5.66% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.95% | 11.53% | -0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.05% | 16.90% | -2.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.70% | 18.30% | -4.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 19.33% | -4.41% |
RSPS vs. PSCC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCC's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPS vs. PSCC - Dividend Comparison
RSPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than PSCC's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 1.72% | 2.35% | 1.88% | 1.49% | 1.29% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 1.77% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.34% |
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 2.97% | 2.82% | 2.86% | 2.78% | 2.31% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 2.12% | 2.43% | 1.90% | 1.76% | 1.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPS and PSCC have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCC has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to RSPS (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPS dropped -35.93% vs PSCC's -33.61%.
On 10-year performance, PSCC leads with 6.95% vs 4.43% for RSPS. On fees, PSCC is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RSPS has been the lower-risk option at 5.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSCC has performed better with a 6.95% return vs 4.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSCC is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPS.
RSPS has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 1.72% for PSCC.
RSPS tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPS and 0.29% for PSCC.
PSCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.33 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPS and PSCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer