RSPS vs. PSCC

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RSPS (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF) and PSCC (Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds from Invesco - RSPS tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC while PSCC tracks the S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPS returned 4.45%/yr vs 6.81%/yr for PSCC. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RSPS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PSCC.

Performance

RSPS vs. PSCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPS achieves a 8.07% return, which is significantly lower than PSCC's 19.62% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPS has underperformed PSCC with an annualized return of 4.45%, while PSCC has yielded a comparatively higher 6.81% annualized return.

RSPS

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 0.34%
• 6M: 0.99%
• YTD: 8.07%
• 1Y: 5.26%
• 3Y*: -0.24%
• 5Y*: 2.06%
• 10Y*: 4.45%
• ALL TIME*: 8.54%

PSCC

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 1.70%
• 6M: 10.74%
• YTD: 19.62%
• 1Y: 9.17%
• 3Y*: 1.30%
• 5Y*: 3.44%
• 10Y*: 6.81%
• ALL TIME*: 10.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF	$228.35K	$315.30K	$252.74K
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF	$3.23M	$2.80M	$2.24M

RSPS vs. PSCC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF	8.07%	-0.88%	-1.47%	-5.39%	2.88%	14.68%	6.19%	28.17%	-10.86%	14.20%
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF	19.62%	-16.47%	0.98%	14.83%	-6.66%	28.82%	11.17%	17.39%	-6.72%	9.72%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPS and PSCC is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010	0.63

The correlation between RSPS and PSCC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSPS vs. PSCC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSPS	PSCC
Consumer Defensive	97.4%	90.8%
Consumer Cyclical	2.6%	2.6%
Financial Services	0.0%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	4.3%
Communication Services	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	2.3%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RSPS vs. PSCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSPS

RSPS Risk / Return Rank: 19
RSPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
RSPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
RSPS Omega Ratio Rank: 18
RSPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
RSPS Martin Ratio Rank: 17

PSCC

PSCC Risk / Return Rank: 21
PSCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
PSCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
PSCC Omega Ratio Rank: 21
PSCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
PSCC Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSPS vs. PSCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSPS	PSCC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.38	0.50	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.64	0.85	-0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.09	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.48	0.59	-0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.83	1.08	-0.25

RSPS vs. PSCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPS Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is comparable to the PSCC Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPS and PSCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSPS vs. PSCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPS drawdown since its inception was -35.93%, which is greater than PSCC's maximum drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPS and PSCC.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPS	PSCC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.93%	-33.61%	-2.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.72%	-14.03%	+2.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.87%	-23.36%	+7.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.61%	-23.36%	+4.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.42%	-33.61%	+8.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.65%	-6.61%	+0.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.06%	-6.01%	+0.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.76%	7.66%	-0.90%

Volatility

RSPS vs. PSCC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) at 5.51%. This indicates that RSPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPS	PSCC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.03%	5.51%	+0.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.84%	12.36%	-0.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.87%	16.58%	-1.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.96%	18.33%	-4.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.01%	19.37%	-4.36%

RSPS vs. PSCC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCC's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPS vs. PSCC - Dividend Comparison

RSPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, more than PSCC's 1.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF	1.64%	2.35%	1.88%	1.49%	1.29%	1.21%	1.59%	1.77%	0.94%	1.25%	1.48%	1.34%
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF	2.88%	2.82%	2.86%	2.78%	2.31%	2.07%	2.14%	2.12%	2.43%	1.90%	1.76%	1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPS and PSCC in my portfolio?

RSPS and PSCC have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSPS or PSCC?

RSPS has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to PSCC (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPS dropped -35.93% vs PSCC's -33.61%.

Which ETF is better, RSPS or PSCC?

On 10-year performance, PSCC leads with 6.81% vs 4.45% for RSPS. On fees, PSCC is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PSCC has been the lower-risk option at 5.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSPS or PSCC?

Over the 10-year period, PSCC has performed better with a 6.81% return vs 4.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPS or PSCC?

PSCC is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPS or PSCC?

RSPS has the higher dividend yield at 2.88%, compared with 1.64% for PSCC.

What is the main difference between RSPS and PSCC?

RSPS tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPS and 0.29% for PSCC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.