RSPR vs. ITB
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB).
RSPR and ITB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSPR is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Real Estate - SEC. It was launched on Aug 12, 2015. ITB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. It was launched on May 1, 2006. Both RSPR and ITB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RSPR or ITB.
Correlation
The correlation between RSPR and ITB is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
RSPR vs. ITB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RSPR:
1.10
ITB:
-0.14
RSPR:
1.53
ITB:
-0.02
RSPR:
1.19
ITB:
1.00
RSPR:
0.74
ITB:
-0.15
RSPR:
3.95
ITB:
-0.36
RSPR:
4.37%
ITB:
10.17%
RSPR:
15.78%
ITB:
26.17%
RSPR:
-41.96%
ITB:
-86.53%
RSPR:
-7.76%
ITB:
-23.91%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPR achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly higher than ITB's -4.91% return.
RSPR
1.87%
2.17%
-1.55%
15.71%
4.73%
N/A
ITB
-4.91%
-10.40%
-20.01%
-5.78%
15.14%
13.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSPR vs. ITB - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ITB's 0.42% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RSPR vs. ITB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
RSPR
ITB
RSPR vs. ITB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RSPR vs. ITB - Dividend Comparison
RSPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than ITB's 0.48% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPR Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF | 2.53% | 2.58% | 2.91% | 3.14% | 2.56% | 3.82% | 2.97% | 3.02% | 3.01% | 2.06% | 1.03% | 0.00% |
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 0.48% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% | 0.34% |
Drawdowns
RSPR vs. ITB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPR drawdown since its inception was -41.96%, smaller than the maximum ITB drawdown of -86.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPR and ITB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RSPR vs. ITB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) is 3.70%, while iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) has a volatility of 7.67%. This indicates that RSPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.