PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RSPG vs. BLOK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


RSPGBLOK
YTD Return13.35%52.56%
1Y Return16.17%109.12%
3Y Return (Ann)20.52%-5.62%
5Y Return (Ann)16.21%24.24%
Sharpe Ratio0.852.88
Sortino Ratio1.243.50
Omega Ratio1.161.41
Calmar Ratio1.161.83
Martin Ratio2.6712.30
Ulcer Index5.90%9.01%
Daily Std Dev18.62%38.47%
Max Drawdown-79.98%-73.33%
Current Drawdown-3.44%-16.47%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between RSPG and BLOK is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

RSPG vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, RSPG achieves a 13.35% return, which is significantly lower than BLOK's 52.56% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%140.00%160.00%180.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
59.37%
173.39%
RSPG
BLOK

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RSPG vs. BLOK - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOK's 0.71% expense ratio.


BLOK
Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF
Expense ratio chart for BLOK: current value at 0.71% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.71%
Expense ratio chart for RSPG: current value at 0.40% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.40%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RSPG vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RSPG, currently valued at 0.85, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.85
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RSPG, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.24
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RSPG, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.16
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RSPG, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.16
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RSPG, currently valued at 2.67, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.67
BLOK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BLOK, currently valued at 2.88, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.88
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BLOK, currently valued at 3.50, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.50
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BLOK, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.41
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BLOK, currently valued at 1.83, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.83
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BLOK, currently valued at 12.30, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0012.30

RSPG vs. BLOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPG Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the BLOK Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPG and BLOK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.85
2.88
RSPG
BLOK

Dividends

RSPG vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison

RSPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, more than BLOK's 0.76% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
RSPG
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
2.52%2.84%3.43%2.37%3.15%2.15%2.18%2.55%1.14%2.80%1.97%0.98%
BLOK
Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF
0.76%1.15%0.00%14.31%1.88%2.05%1.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RSPG vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPG drawdown since its inception was -79.98%, which is greater than BLOK's maximum drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPG and BLOK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.44%
-16.47%
RSPG
BLOK

Volatility

RSPG vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) is 6.82%, while Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) has a volatility of 13.02%. This indicates that RSPG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.82%
13.02%
RSPG
BLOK