RSP vs. IWV
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV).
RSP and IWV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSP is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Equal Weight Index. It was launched on Apr 30, 2003. IWV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 3000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both RSP and IWV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RSP or IWV.
Performance
RSP vs. IWV - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSP achieves a 19.00% return, which is significantly lower than IWV's 26.09% return. Over the past 10 years, RSP has underperformed IWV with an annualized return of 10.62%, while IWV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.60% annualized return.
RSP
19.00%
3.69%
12.70%
28.70%
12.60%
10.62%
IWV
26.09%
4.02%
13.99%
33.40%
15.08%
12.60%
Key characteristics
RSP | IWV | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 2.50 | 2.66 |
Sortino Ratio | 3.47 | 3.55 |
Omega Ratio | 1.44 | 1.49 |
Calmar Ratio | 3.63 | 3.98 |
Martin Ratio | 14.40 | 17.24 |
Ulcer Index | 1.99% | 1.94% |
Daily Std Dev | 11.49% | 12.55% |
Max Drawdown | -59.92% | -55.61% |
Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -0.37% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSP vs. IWV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RSP and IWV have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between RSP and IWV is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RSP vs. IWV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RSP vs. IWV - Dividend Comparison
RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than IWV's 1.07% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF | 1.43% | 1.63% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% | 1.46% | 1.27% |
iShares Russell 3000 ETF | 1.07% | 1.30% | 1.56% | 1.04% | 1.30% | 1.69% | 1.97% | 1.58% | 1.79% | 1.99% | 1.62% | 1.61% |
Drawdowns
RSP vs. IWV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSP drawdown since its inception was -59.92%, which is greater than IWV's maximum drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSP and IWV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RSP vs. IWV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF (RSP) is 3.68%, while iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that RSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.