RRGB vs. VOO
RRGB (Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, RRGB returned -16.28%/yr vs 15.14%/yr for VOO. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RRGB vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RRGB achieves a 93.58% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, RRGB has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of -16.28%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.
RRGB
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 9.65%
- 6M
- 110.19%
- YTD
- 93.58%
- 1Y
- 41.52%
- 3Y*
- -17.98%
- 5Y*
- -21.46%
- 10Y*
- -16.28%
- ALL TIME*
- -1.84%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 8.58%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 21.58%
- 3Y*
- 19.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.04M | $1.11M | $2.00M | |
| $3.82B | $3.78B | $5.44B |
RRGB vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RRGB Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. | 93.58% | -26.23% | -55.97% | 123.48% | -66.24% | -14.04% | -41.76% | 23.58% | -52.62% | -0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.16% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between RRGB and VOO is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RRGB vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
RRGB
VOO
RRGB vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (RRGB) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RRGB | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.28 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 2.21 | -1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.94 | 9.44 | -8.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RRGB vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RRGB drawdown since its inception was -97.24%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRGB and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RRGB | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.24% | -33.99% | -63.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.05% | -8.90% | -56.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -81.98% | -18.69% | -63.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.42% | -24.52% | -65.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.49% | -33.99% | -62.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.56% | -1.38% | -90.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.47% | -3.67% | -46.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.36% | 2.08% | +35.28% |
Volatility
RRGB vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (RRGB) has a higher volatility of 13.64% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.54%. This indicates that RRGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RRGB | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.64% | 3.54% | +10.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.74% | 10.10% | +50.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.79% | 12.82% | +60.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.39% | 16.93% | +59.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.35% | 18.01% | +56.34% |
Dividends
RRGB vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
RRGB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RRGB Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.07% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RRGB and VOO have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RRGB has higher volatility (13.64%) compared to VOO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RRGB dropped -97.24% vs VOO's -33.99%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RRGB and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer