PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RRBI vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RRBI vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Red River Bancshares, Inc. (RRBI) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RRBI vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RRBI
Red River Bancshares, Inc.
29.62%33.50%-3.11%10.59%-4.04%8.53%-11.12%11.56%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-3.66%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%11.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RRBI achieves a 29.62% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -3.66% return.


RRBI

1D
2.08%
1M
3.39%
YTD
29.62%
6M
43.90%
1Y
79.20%
3Y*
25.25%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*

VOO

1D
0.79%
1M
-4.29%
YTD
-3.66%
6M
-1.41%
1Y
18.17%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
14.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RRBI vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RRBI
RRBI Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
RRBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RRBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
RRBI Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
RRBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
RRBI Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RRBI vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Red River Bancshares, Inc. (RRBI) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RRBIVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.74

1.01

+1.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.47

1.53

+1.94

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.23

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.92

1.55

+7.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

25.45

7.31

+18.14

RRBI vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RRBI Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RRBI and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RRBIVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

1.01

+1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.71

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.83

-0.57

Correlation

The correlation between RRBI and VOO is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

RRBI vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

RRBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than VOO's 1.18% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RRBI
Red River Bancshares, Inc.
0.73%0.76%0.67%0.57%0.55%0.52%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.18%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Drawdowns

RRBI vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RRBI drawdown since its inception was -46.91%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RRBI and VOO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RRBIVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.91%

-33.99%

-12.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.02%

-11.98%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.93%

-24.52%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.55%

+5.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.26%

-3.72%

-10.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

2.55%

+0.61%

Volatility

RRBI vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Red River Bancshares, Inc. (RRBI) has a higher volatility of 7.35% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.34%. This indicates that RRBI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RRBIVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.35%

5.34%

+2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.28%

9.47%

+10.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.04%

18.11%

+10.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.81%

16.82%

+11.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.34%

17.99%

+19.35%