PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RQI vs. SCHG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RQI and SCHG is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

RQI vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.55%
18.85%
RQI
SCHG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RQI:

0.79

SCHG:

1.71

Sortino Ratio

RQI:

1.17

SCHG:

2.28

Omega Ratio

RQI:

1.15

SCHG:

1.31

Calmar Ratio

RQI:

0.55

SCHG:

2.53

Martin Ratio

RQI:

2.78

SCHG:

9.59

Ulcer Index

RQI:

5.58%

SCHG:

3.26%

Daily Std Dev

RQI:

19.54%

SCHG:

18.13%

Max Drawdown

RQI:

-91.64%

SCHG:

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

RQI:

-9.33%

SCHG:

-2.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RQI achieves a 5.18% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 2.08% return. Over the past 10 years, RQI has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 8.44%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.82% annualized return.


RQI

YTD

5.18%

1M

5.18%

6M

3.55%

1Y

13.73%

5Y*

6.42%

10Y*

8.44%

SCHG

YTD

2.08%

1M

2.08%

6M

18.85%

1Y

32.20%

5Y*

19.64%

10Y*

16.82%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RQI vs. SCHG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RQI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RQI is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RQI is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RQI is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RQI is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RQI is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RQI is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCHG is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCHG is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCHG is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCHG is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCHG is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RQI vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RQI, currently valued at 0.79, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.791.71
The chart of Sortino ratio for RQI, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.172.28
The chart of Omega ratio for RQI, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.151.31
The chart of Calmar ratio for RQI, currently valued at 0.55, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.552.53
The chart of Martin ratio for RQI, currently valued at 2.78, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.002.789.59
RQI
SCHG

The current RQI Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RQI and SCHG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.79
1.71
RQI
SCHG

Dividends

RQI vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

RQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.51%, more than SCHG's 0.39% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RQI
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund
7.51%7.84%7.84%10.41%5.27%7.74%6.79%9.27%7.59%7.86%7.86%6.23%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.39%0.40%0.47%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%1.09%

Drawdowns

RQI vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RQI drawdown since its inception was -91.64%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RQI and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-9.33%
-2.23%
RQI
SCHG

Volatility

RQI vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) is 5.35%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 6.30%. This indicates that RQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.35%
6.30%
RQI
SCHG
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab