PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPMGX vs. VDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPMGX vs. VDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPMGX achieves a 2.18% return, which is significantly lower than VDC's 5.75% return. Over the past 10 years, RPMGX has outperformed VDC with an annualized return of 10.96%, while VDC has yielded a comparatively lower 7.59% annualized return.


RPMGX

1D
-0.22%
1M
1.74%
YTD
2.18%
6M
1.75%
1Y
7.70%
3Y*
12.61%
5Y*
5.50%
10Y*
10.96%

VDC

1D
0.61%
1M
-3.32%
YTD
5.75%
6M
4.31%
1Y
1.24%
3Y*
7.43%
5Y*
6.06%
10Y*
7.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPMGX vs. VDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPMGX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund
2.18%3.65%21.08%20.27%-22.51%14.94%24.16%31.53%-2.12%24.80%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
5.75%2.17%13.30%2.38%-1.79%17.64%10.86%26.11%-7.79%11.85%

Correlation

The correlation between RPMGX and VDC is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between RPMGX and VDC has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPMGX vs. VDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPMGX
RPMGX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
RPMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
RPMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

VDC
VDC Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPMGX vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RPMGXVDCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.66

0.10

+0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.04

0.23

+0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.03

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

0.13

+0.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.00

0.28

+2.72

RPMGX vs. VDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPMGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is higher than the VDC Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPMGX and VDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RPMGXVDCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

0.10

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.46

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.52

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.66

+0.01

Drawdowns

RPMGX vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPMGX drawdown since its inception was -54.66%, which is greater than VDC's maximum drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPMGX and VDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPMGXVDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.66%

-34.24%

-20.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.21%

-9.28%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.52%

-11.78%

-9.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.08%

-16.55%

-15.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.96%

-25.31%

-10.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

-8.52%

+6.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-3.73%

-3.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

4.49%

-1.53%

Volatility

RPMGX vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund (RPMGX) is 3.41%, while Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) has a volatility of 4.09%. This indicates that RPMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPMGXVDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

4.09%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.17%

9.76%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.51%

12.36%

+1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.11%

13.13%

+5.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.00%

14.64%

+4.36%

RPMGX vs. VDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPMGX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than VDC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPMGX vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison

RPMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.22%, more than VDC's 2.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RPMGX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund
6.22%6.35%20.43%6.35%2.60%10.52%4.53%5.29%12.12%8.04%3.45%9.51%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
2.17%2.26%2.33%2.65%2.37%2.14%2.50%2.44%2.78%2.52%2.39%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPMGX and VDC have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VDC has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to RPMGX (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPMGX dropped -54.66% vs VDC's -34.24%.

RPMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPMGX and VDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer