PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RPM vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RPM vs. SMH

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RPM (RPM International Inc.) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, RPM returned 10.39%/yr vs 38.85%/yr for SMH. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RPM vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RPM International Inc. (RPM) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPM achieves a 4.46% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 85.74% return. Over the past 10 years, RPM has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 10.39%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 38.85% annualized return.

RPM

1D
-0.41%
1M
6.60%
YTD
4.46%
6M
3.20%
1Y
2.65%
3Y*
11.38%
5Y*
6.03%
10Y*
10.39%

SMH

1D
1.37%
1M
16.07%
YTD
85.74%
6M
85.96%
1Y
157.81%
3Y*
66.26%
5Y*
40.65%
10Y*
38.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPM vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPM
RPM International Inc.		4.46%-13.92%12.06%16.79%-1.71%13.24%20.57%33.66%14.83%-0.34%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF		85.74%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between RPM and SMH is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2000

0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between RPM and SMH has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RPM International Inc.

VanEck Semiconductor ETF

Often compared with RPM:
RPM vs. IFFRPM vs. SPYRPM vs. MASRPM vs. ROPRPM vs. UBSIRPM vs. ^GSPCRPM vs. MO
Often compared with SMH:
SMH vs. SOXXSMH vs. QQQSMH vs. VGTSMH vs. FSELXSMH vs. SPYSMH vs. SMHXSMH vs. XLK

Return for Risk

RPM vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RPM
RPM Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
RPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPM Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
RPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPM Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPM vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RPM International Inc. (RPM) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

RPMSMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.09
4.66

-4.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.39
4.60

-4.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.66

-0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.10

10.63

-10.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.19

38.91

-38.72

RPM vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPM Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 4.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPM and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RPM vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPM drawdown since its inception was -61.69%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPM and SMH.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RPMSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.69%

-84.96%

+23.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.59%

-14.93%

-11.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.97%

-35.74%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.97%

-45.30%

+13.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.72%

-45.30%

+6.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.11%

0.00%

-21.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.95%

-41.01%

+30.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.16%

4.07%

+10.09%

Volatility

RPM vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RPM International Inc. (RPM) is 7.31%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 17.29%. This indicates that RPM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RPMSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.31%

17.29%

-9.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.73%

28.18%

-5.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.41%

34.14%

-5.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.50%

35.68%

-9.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.84%

32.95%

-6.11%

Dividends

RPM vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

RPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than SMH's 0.17% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RPM
RPM International Inc.		1.98%1.99%1.54%1.54%1.66%1.52%1.61%1.84%2.23%2.33%2.09%2.39%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF		0.17%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

RPM and SMH have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMH has higher volatility (17.29%) compared to RPM (7.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPM dropped -61.69% vs SMH's -84.96%.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.66 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPM and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer