RPM vs. MAS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about RPM International Inc. (RPM) and Masco Corporation (MAS).

Performance

RPM vs. MAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RPM International Inc. (RPM) and Masco Corporation (MAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RPM vs. MAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RPM RPM International Inc.	-3.96%	-13.92%	12.06%	16.79%	-1.71%	13.24%	20.57%	33.66%	14.83%	-0.34%
MAS Masco Corporation	-4.46%	-10.92%	10.04%	46.56%	-32.09%	29.61%	15.78%	66.27%	-32.70%	40.55%

Fundamentals

Market Cap RPM : $12.70B MAS : $12.50B
EPS RPM : $5.21 MAS : $3.86
PE Ratio RPM : 19.07 MAS : 15.63
PEG Ratio RPM : 2.12 MAS : 0.76
PS Ratio RPM : 1.68 MAS : 1.67
PB Ratio RPM : 4.06 MAS : 164.43
Total Revenue (TTM) RPM : $7.58B MAS : $7.56B
Gross Profit (TTM) RPM : $3.12B MAS : $2.68B
EBITDA (TTM) RPM : $1.10B MAS : $1.23B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPM achieves a -3.96% return, which is significantly higher than MAS's -4.46% return. Over the past 10 years, RPM has outperformed MAS with an annualized return of 9.76%, while MAS has yielded a comparatively lower 8.16% annualized return.

RPM

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -12.90%
• YTD: -3.96%
• 6M: -14.86%
• 1Y: -12.41%
• 3Y*: 6.34%
• 5Y*: 3.32%
• 10Y*: 9.76%

MAS

• 1D: 3.02%
• 1M: -15.71%
• YTD: -4.46%
• 6M: -13.44%
• 1Y: -11.55%
• 3Y*: 8.62%
• 5Y*: 1.65%
• 10Y*: 8.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RPM vs. MAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPM

RPM Risk / Return Rank: 24
RPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
RPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
RPM Omega Ratio Rank: 21
RPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
RPM Martin Ratio Rank: 26

MAS

MAS Risk / Return Rank: 26
MAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
MAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
MAS Omega Ratio Rank: 24
MAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
MAS Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPM vs. MAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RPM International Inc. (RPM) and Masco Corporation (MAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RPM	MAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.44	-0.34	-0.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.47	-0.30	-0.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	0.97	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.42	-0.43	+0.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.95	-0.87	-0.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RPM vs. MAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPM Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is comparable to the MAS Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPM and MAS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RPM	MAS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.44	-0.34	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	0.06	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37	0.28	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.21	+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between RPM and MAS is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RPM vs. MAS - Dividend Comparison

RPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, more than MAS's 2.07% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RPM RPM International Inc.	2.11%	1.99%	1.54%	1.54%	1.66%	1.52%	1.61%	1.84%	2.23%	2.33%	2.09%	2.39%
MAS Masco Corporation	2.07%	1.95%	1.60%	1.70%	2.40%	1.20%	0.99%	1.03%	1.49%	0.92%	1.22%	12.68%

Drawdowns

RPM vs. MAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPM drawdown since its inception was -61.69%, smaller than the maximum MAS drawdown of -88.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPM and MAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	RPM	MAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.69%	-88.75%	+27.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.59%	-24.38%	-2.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.97%	-37.95%	+5.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.72%	-44.83%	+6.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.47%	-27.68%	+0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.87%	-23.66%	+12.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.81%	11.93%	-0.12%

Volatility

RPM vs. MAS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RPM International Inc. (RPM) is 8.42%, while Masco Corporation (MAS) has a volatility of 9.11%. This indicates that RPM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RPM	MAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.42%	9.11%	-0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.95%	21.74%	-4.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.45%	33.98%	-5.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.57%	29.20%	-3.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.30%	28.96%	-2.66%

Financials

RPM vs. MAS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between RPM International Inc. and Masco Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

RPM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, RPM International Inc. reported a gross profit of 780.17M and revenue of 1.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.9%.

MAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Masco Corporation reported a gross profit of 607.00M and revenue of 1.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.

RPM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, RPM International Inc. reported an operating income of 230.70M and revenue of 1.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.

MAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Masco Corporation reported an operating income of 248.00M and revenue of 1.79B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.8%.

RPM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, RPM International Inc. reported a net income of 161.21M and revenue of 1.91B, resulting in a net margin of 8.4%.

MAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Masco Corporation reported a net income of 165.00M and revenue of 1.79B, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.