RPM vs. IFF
RPM (RPM International Inc.) and IFF (International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Specialty Chemicals industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, RPM returned 10.39%/yr vs -3.25%/yr for IFF. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RPM vs. IFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPM achieves a 4.46% return, which is significantly lower than IFF's 13.97% return. Over the past 10 years, RPM has outperformed IFF with an annualized return of 10.39%, while IFF has yielded a comparatively lower -3.25% annualized return.
RPM
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 6.60%
- YTD
- 4.46%
- 6M
- 3.20%
- 1Y
- 2.65%
- 3Y*
- 11.38%
- 5Y*
- 6.03%
- 10Y*
- 10.39%
IFF
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- 13.97%
- 6M
- 15.37%
- 1Y
- 5.56%
- 3Y*
- 2.78%
- 5Y*
- -10.07%
- 10Y*
- -3.25%
RPM vs. IFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPM RPM International Inc. | 4.46% | -13.92% | 12.06% | 16.79% | -1.71% | 13.24% | 20.57% | 33.66% | 14.83% | -0.34% |
IFF International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. | 13.97% | -18.43% | 6.26% | -19.47% | -28.35% | 41.55% | -15.64% | -3.91% | -12.02% | 29.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between RPM and IFF is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.40 |
The correlation between RPM and IFF shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.57 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RPM:
$5.21
IFF:
$4.35
RPM:
20.64
IFF:
17.45
RPM:
1.78
IFF:
1.36
RPM:
$7.71B
IFF:
$10.79B
RPM:
$3.19B
IFF:
$3.79B
RPM:
$1.08B
IFF:
$1.77B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RPM vs. IFF — Risk / Return Rank
RPM
IFF
RPM vs. IFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RPM International Inc. (RPM) and International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RPM | IFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.06 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | 0.25 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.19 | 0.44 | -0.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RPM vs. IFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPM drawdown since its inception was -61.69%, smaller than the maximum IFF drawdown of -87.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPM and IFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPM | IFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.69% | -87.25% | +25.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.59% | -22.61% | -3.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.97% | -42.63% | +10.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.97% | -57.42% | +25.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.72% | -57.42% | +18.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.11% | -44.60% | +23.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.95% | -37.28% | +26.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.16% | 12.65% | +1.51% |
Volatility
RPM vs. IFF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RPM International Inc. (RPM) is 7.31%, while International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF) has a volatility of 8.67%. This indicates that RPM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RPM | IFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.31% | 8.67% | -1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.73% | 27.89% | -5.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.41% | 34.18% | -5.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.50% | 31.84% | -5.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.84% | 30.44% | -3.60% |
Dividends
RPM vs. IFF - Dividend Comparison
RPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than IFF's 2.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFF International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. | 2.11% | 2.37% | 1.89% | 4.00% | 3.05% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RPM RPM International Inc. | 1.98% | 1.99% | 1.54% | 1.54% | 1.66% | 1.52% | 1.61% | 1.84% | 2.23% | 2.33% | 2.09% | 2.39% |
Financials
RPM vs. IFF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RPM International Inc. and International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RPM vs. IFF - Profitability Comparison
RPM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RPM International Inc. reported a gross profit of 634.82M and revenue of 1.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.5%.
IFF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.02B and revenue of 2.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.1%.
RPM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RPM International Inc. reported an operating income of 81.09M and revenue of 1.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.
IFF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. reported an operating income of 273.00M and revenue of 2.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.
RPM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RPM International Inc. reported a net income of 51.36M and revenue of 1.61B, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.
IFF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. reported a net income of 169.00M and revenue of 2.74B, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RPM and IFF have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IFF has higher volatility (8.67%) compared to RPM (7.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPM dropped -61.69% vs IFF's -87.25%.
IFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RPM and IFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer