RPM vs. ^GSPC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about RPM International Inc. (RPM) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC).

Performance

RPM vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RPM International Inc. (RPM) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RPM vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RPM RPM International Inc.	-2.77%	-13.92%	12.06%	16.79%	-1.71%	13.24%	20.57%	33.66%	14.83%	-0.34%
^GSPC S&P 500 Index	-3.95%	16.39%	23.31%	24.23%	-19.44%	26.89%	16.26%	28.88%	-6.24%	19.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPM achieves a -2.77% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, RPM has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 9.89%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.24% annualized return.

RPM

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: -9.03%
• YTD: -2.77%
• 6M: -13.30%
• 1Y: -11.92%
• 3Y*: 6.78%
• 5Y*: 3.58%
• 10Y*: 9.89%

^GSPC

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: -4.45%
• YTD: -3.95%
• 6M: -2.02%
• 1Y: 16.73%
• 3Y*: 16.96%
• 5Y*: 10.34%
• 10Y*: 12.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RPM vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPM

RPM Risk / Return Rank: 23
RPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
RPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
RPM Omega Ratio Rank: 20
RPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
RPM Martin Ratio Rank: 24

^GSPC

^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 67
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 69
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPM vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RPM International Inc. (RPM) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RPM	^GSPC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.42	0.92	-1.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.45	1.41	-1.86
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.21	-0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.43	1.41	-1.84
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.95	6.61	-7.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RPM vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPM Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPM and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RPM	^GSPC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.42	0.92	-1.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	0.61	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38	0.68	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.46	-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between RPM and ^GSPC is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Drawdowns

RPM vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPM drawdown since its inception was -61.69%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPM and ^GSPC.

Drawdown Indicators

	RPM	^GSPC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.69%	-56.78%	-4.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.59%	-12.14%	-14.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.97%	-25.43%	-6.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.72%	-33.92%	-4.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.57%	-5.78%	-20.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.87%	-10.75%	-0.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.89%	2.60%	+9.29%

Volatility

RPM vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

RPM International Inc. (RPM) has a higher volatility of 8.52% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 5.37%. This indicates that RPM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RPM	^GSPC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.52%	5.37%	+3.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.98%	9.55%	+7.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.45%	18.33%	+10.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.57%	16.90%	+8.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.30%	18.05%	+8.25%