PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROUS vs. VIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROUS vs. VIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROUS achieves a 16.55% return, which is significantly higher than VIG's 7.57% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ROUS having a 13.01% annualized return and VIG not far ahead at 13.23%.


ROUS

1D
0.01%
1M
6.18%
YTD
16.55%
6M
16.75%
1Y
29.42%
3Y*
20.87%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
13.01%

VIG

1D
-0.19%
1M
3.79%
YTD
7.57%
6M
6.99%
1Y
19.63%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
10.62%
10Y*
13.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROUS vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
16.55%15.21%17.61%15.05%-9.65%27.33%6.61%23.94%-9.59%22.88%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
7.57%14.17%16.99%14.51%-9.80%23.76%15.43%29.62%-2.08%22.22%

Correlation

The correlation between ROUS and VIG is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2015

0.84

The correlation between ROUS and VIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.94 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ROUS vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROUS
VIG

Technology

33.2%
26.2%

Healthcare

10.7%
16.5%

Financial Services

10.6%
20.6%

Industrials

10.4%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
4.7%

Communication Services

8.6%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.8%
10.1%

Utilities

3.8%
3.2%

Energy

3.0%
3.5%

Basic Materials

2.2%
3.5%

Real Estate

2.1%

-

Technology

ROUS
33.2%
VIG
26.2%

Healthcare

ROUS
10.7%
VIG
16.5%

Financial Services

ROUS
10.6%
VIG
20.6%

Industrials

ROUS
10.4%
VIG
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ROUS
9.6%
VIG
4.7%

Communication Services

ROUS
8.6%
VIG
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

ROUS
5.8%
VIG
10.1%

Utilities

ROUS
3.8%
VIG
3.2%

Energy

ROUS
3.0%
VIG
3.5%

Basic Materials

ROUS
2.2%
VIG
3.5%

Real Estate

ROUS
2.1%
VIG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROUS vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROUS
ROUS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ROUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ROUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

VIG
VIG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIG Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROUS vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROUSVIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.35

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.95

2.49

+2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.38

10.06

+10.31

ROUS vs. VIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the VIG Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROUS and VIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROUSVIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

1.97

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.75

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.83

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.60

+0.07

Drawdowns

ROUS vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROUS drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, smaller than the maximum VIG drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROUS and VIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROUSVIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.51%

-46.81%

+11.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.97%

-7.91%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.81%

-14.95%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.91%

-20.39%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.51%

-31.72%

-3.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.19%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-5.51%

+1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

1.96%

-0.51%

Volatility

ROUS vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) has a higher volatility of 2.54% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.19%. This indicates that ROUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROUSVIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

2.19%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

7.57%

+0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.37%

10.01%

+1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

14.23%

+0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.96%

16.05%

+0.91%

ROUS vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ROUS vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison

ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than VIG's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
1.32%1.52%1.62%1.91%1.88%1.38%2.01%2.12%1.89%1.54%1.97%1.62%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
1.47%1.62%1.73%1.88%1.96%1.55%1.63%1.71%2.08%1.88%2.14%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROUS and VIG have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROUS has higher volatility (2.54%) compared to VIG (2.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROUS dropped -35.51% vs VIG's -46.81%.

On 10-year performance, VIG leads with 13.23% vs 13.01% for ROUS. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VIG has performed better with a 13.23% return vs 13.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ROUS.

VIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 1.32% for ROUS.

ROUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VIG is Dividend. ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ROUS and 0.04% for VIG.

ROUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROUS and VIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer