ROST vs. VRTS

In the year-to-date period, ROST achieves a -7.34% return, which is significantly higher than VRTS's -30.51% return. Over the past 10 years, ROST has outperformed VRTS with an annualized return of 11.74%, while VRTS has yielded a comparatively lower 3.38% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST) and Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ROST Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is higher than the VRTS Sharpe Ratio of -0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROST and VRTS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ROST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than VRTS's 5.41% yield.

The maximum ROST drawdown since its inception was -82.24%, which is greater than VRTS's maximum drawdown of -74.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROST and VRTS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST) is 10.68%, while Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) has a volatility of 17.73%. This indicates that ROST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ross Stores, Inc. and Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.