RORO vs. AOA
Compare and contrast key facts about ATAC US Rotation ETF (RORO) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA).
RORO and AOA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RORO is an actively managed fund by ATAC. It was launched on Nov 17, 2020. AOA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RORO or AOA.
Key characteristics
| RORO | AOA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 5.54% | 16.00% |
| 1Y Return | 21.83% | 27.19% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -7.69% | 4.69% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.96 | 2.68 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.44 | 3.76 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.19 | 1.50 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.53 | 2.63 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.56 | 17.75 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.31% | 1.49% |
| Daily Std Dev | 19.63% | 9.85% |
| Max Drawdown | -49.69% | -28.38% |
| Current Drawdown | -21.29% | -0.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between RORO and AOA is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
RORO vs. AOA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, RORO achieves a 5.54% return, which is significantly lower than AOA's 16.00% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RORO vs. AOA - Expense Ratio Comparison
RORO has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than AOA's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RORO vs. AOA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ATAC US Rotation ETF (RORO) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RORO vs. AOA - Dividend Comparison
RORO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, more than AOA's 2.08% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RORO ATAC US Rotation ETF | 2.88% | 2.11% | 1.81% | 2.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AOA iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF | 2.08% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 1.67% | 1.71% | 2.50% | 2.37% | 5.09% | 2.02% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
RORO vs. AOA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RORO drawdown since its inception was -49.69%, which is greater than AOA's maximum drawdown of -28.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RORO and AOA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RORO vs. AOA - Volatility Comparison
ATAC US Rotation ETF (RORO) has a higher volatility of 6.74% compared to iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) at 2.69%. This indicates that RORO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.