ROM vs. SCHD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ROM (ProShares Ultra Technology) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROM is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (200%), while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ROM returned 42.70%/yr vs 12.77%/yr for SCHD. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.

Performance

ROM vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROM achieves a 77.72% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's 19.01% return. Over the past 10 years, ROM has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 42.70%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.77% annualized return.

ROM

• 1D: -2.01%
• 1M: 45.36%
• YTD: 77.72%
• 6M: 74.45%
• 1Y: 152.07%
• 3Y*: 59.24%
• 5Y*: 31.70%
• 10Y*: 42.70%

SCHD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.70%
• YTD: 19.01%
• 6M: 18.63%
• 1Y: 27.16%
• 3Y*: 15.09%
• 5Y*: 8.36%
• 10Y*: 12.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROM vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology	77.72%	35.63%	31.65%	130.70%	-63.86%	77.75%	80.42%	102.10%	-9.89%	81.11%
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	19.01%	4.34%	11.66%	4.54%	-3.26%	29.87%	15.03%	27.29%	-5.56%	20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between ROM and SCHD is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011	0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between ROM and SCHD has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ROM vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ROM	SCHD
Technology	55.2%	16.4%
Financial Services	3.0%	9.3%
Energy	0.1%	16.2%
Industrials	0.0%	7.5%
Basic Materials	-	1.2%
Communication Services	-	6.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	6.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	19.2%
Healthcare	-	18.8%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	0.0%

Return for Risk

ROM vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROM

ROM Risk / Return Rank: 83
ROM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ROM Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
ROM Omega Ratio Rank: 80
ROM Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
ROM Martin Ratio Rank: 75

SCHD

SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 80
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 73
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROM vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ROM	SCHD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.66	2.49	+1.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.69	3.87	-0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.45	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.73	5.91	-1.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.47	14.53	-0.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ROM vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROM Sharpe Ratio is 3.66, which is higher than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROM and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ROM	SCHD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.66	2.49	+1.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	0.58	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86	0.77	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.86	-0.32

Drawdowns

ROM vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROM drawdown since its inception was -83.36%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROM and SCHD.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROM	SCHD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.36%	-33.37%	-49.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.33%	-4.61%	-27.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.10%	-16.13%	-31.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.55%	-16.85%	-50.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.55%	-33.37%	-34.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.01%	-1.40%	-0.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.88%	-3.32%	-17.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.55%	1.88%	+8.67%

Volatility

ROM vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) has a higher volatility of 14.00% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.66%. This indicates that ROM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROM	SCHD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.00%	2.66%	+11.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.37%	7.66%	+25.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.83%	10.96%	+30.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.63%	14.38%	+37.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.82%	16.72%	+33.10%

ROM vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROM vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

ROM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology	0.14%	0.24%	0.21%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.05%	0.16%	0.30%	0.08%	0.20%	0.12%
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	3.26%	3.82%	3.64%	3.49%	3.39%	2.78%	3.16%	2.98%	3.06%	2.63%	2.89%	2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROM and SCHD in my portfolio?

ROM and SCHD have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROM or SCHD?

ROM has higher volatility (14.00%) compared to SCHD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROM dropped -83.36% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

Which ETF is better, ROM or SCHD?

On 10-year performance, ROM leads with 42.70% vs 12.77% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ROM or SCHD?

Over the 10-year period, ROM has performed better with a 42.70% return vs 12.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROM or SCHD?

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROM or SCHD?

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 0.14% for ROM.

What is the main difference between ROM and SCHD?

ROM is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. ROM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (200%), while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ROM and 0.06% for SCHD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.66 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.