PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROM vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROM vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROM achieves a 48.47% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's 18.92% return. Over the past 10 years, ROM has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 41.60%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.84% annualized return.


ROM

1D
-4.05%
1M
-8.02%
YTD
48.47%
6M
43.07%
1Y
87.84%
3Y*
47.89%
5Y*
24.74%
10Y*
41.60%

SCHD

1D
0.41%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
18.92%
6M
18.01%
1Y
26.07%
3Y*
14.47%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
12.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROM vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROM
ProShares Ultra Technology
48.47%35.63%31.65%130.70%-63.86%77.75%80.42%102.10%-9.89%81.11%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
18.92%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between ROM and SCHD is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between ROM and SCHD has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ROM vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROM
SCHD

Technology

54.8%
19.4%

Financial Services

3.0%
9.1%

Energy

0.1%
14.6%

Industrials

0.0%
7.4%

Basic Materials

-

1.2%

Communication Services

-

6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

18.5%

Healthcare

-

18.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.0%

Technology

ROM
54.8%
SCHD
19.4%

Financial Services

ROM
3.0%
SCHD
9.1%

Energy

ROM
0.1%
SCHD
14.6%

Industrials

ROM
0.0%
SCHD
7.4%

Basic Materials

ROM

-

SCHD
1.2%

Communication Services

ROM

-

SCHD
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ROM

-

SCHD
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

ROM

-

SCHD
18.5%

Healthcare

ROM

-

SCHD
18.4%

Real Estate

ROM

-

SCHD

-

Utilities

ROM

-

SCHD
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROM vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROM
ROM Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ROM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
ROM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROM Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROM vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROMSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.43

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

5.67

-2.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.85

13.65

-5.80

ROM vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROM Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROM and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROM vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROM drawdown since its inception was -83.36%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROM and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROMSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.36%

-33.37%

-49.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.33%

-4.61%

-27.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.10%

-16.13%

-31.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.55%

-16.85%

-50.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.55%

-33.37%

-34.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.14%

-1.48%

-16.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.85%

-3.31%

-17.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.15%

1.92%

+9.23%

Volatility

ROM vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) has a higher volatility of 25.16% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.14%. This indicates that ROM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROMSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.16%

3.14%

+22.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.71%

7.73%

+31.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.18%

11.04%

+36.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.55%

14.35%

+38.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.21%

16.70%

+33.51%

ROM vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROM vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

ROM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than SCHD's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROM
ProShares Ultra Technology
0.06%0.24%0.21%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.05%0.16%0.30%0.08%0.20%0.12%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.27%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROM and SCHD have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROM has higher volatility (25.16%) compared to SCHD (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROM dropped -83.36% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, ROM leads with 41.60% vs 12.84% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ROM has performed better with a 41.60% return vs 12.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROM.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 0.06% for ROM.

ROM is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. ROM tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Index (200%), while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ROM and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROM and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer