ROKU vs. AFRM

In the year-to-date period, ROKU achieves a -11.61% return, which is significantly higher than AFRM's -19.39% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roku, Inc. (ROKU) and Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ROKU Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the AFRM Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROKU and AFRM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither ROKU nor AFRM has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum ROKU drawdown since its inception was -91.91%, roughly equal to the maximum AFRM drawdown of -94.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROKU and AFRM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Roku, Inc. (ROKU) is 27.81%, while Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) has a volatility of 34.87%. This indicates that ROKU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AFRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Roku, Inc. and Affirm Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.