ROKT vs. VOT
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT).
ROKT and VOT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ROKT is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2018. VOT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Mid Cap Growth Index. It was launched on Aug 17, 2006. Both ROKT and VOT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ROKT or VOT.
Correlation
The correlation between ROKT and VOT is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ROKT vs. VOT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ROKT:
1.47
VOT:
1.24
ROKT:
2.05
VOT:
1.71
ROKT:
1.27
VOT:
1.22
ROKT:
3.16
VOT:
0.99
ROKT:
8.46
VOT:
7.24
ROKT:
3.17%
VOT:
2.58%
ROKT:
18.21%
VOT:
15.12%
ROKT:
-43.16%
VOT:
-60.17%
ROKT:
-8.47%
VOT:
-6.98%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROKT achieves a 23.56% return, which is significantly higher than VOT's 17.05% return.
ROKT
23.56%
0.04%
23.47%
25.07%
9.84%
N/A
VOT
17.05%
-1.21%
10.73%
17.75%
10.78%
10.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ROKT vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROKT has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VOT's 0.07% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ROKT vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ROKT vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison
ROKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than VOT's 0.69% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROKT SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF | 0.34% | 0.62% | 0.54% | 1.79% | 0.48% | 0.74% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.69% | 0.71% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.56% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.81% | 0.79% | 0.61% |
Drawdowns
ROKT vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROKT drawdown since its inception was -43.16%, smaller than the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROKT and VOT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ROKT vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) has a higher volatility of 7.92% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) at 5.37%. This indicates that ROKT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.