ROG.SW vs. LONN.SW

In the year-to-date period, ROG.SW achieves a 7.98% return, which is significantly lower than LONN.SW's 44.67% return. Over the past 10 years, ROG.SW has underperformed LONN.SW with an annualized return of 1.96%, while LONN.SW has yielded a comparatively higher 18.85% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roche Holding AG (ROG.SW) and Lonza Group AG (LONN.SW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ROG.SW Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the LONN.SW Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROG.SW and LONN.SW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ROG.SW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than LONN.SW's 0.79% yield.

The maximum ROG.SW drawdown since its inception was -58.88%, smaller than the maximum LONN.SW drawdown of -76.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROG.SW and LONN.SW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Roche Holding AG (ROG.SW) is 5.44%, while Lonza Group AG (LONN.SW) has a volatility of 10.35%. This indicates that ROG.SW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LONN.SW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Roche Holding AG and Lonza Group AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.