PortfoliosLab logo
ROCK vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ROCK and COST is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

ROCK vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gibraltar Industries, Inc. (ROCK) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ROCK:

-0.54

COST:

1.29

Sortino Ratio

ROCK:

-0.56

COST:

1.81

Omega Ratio

ROCK:

0.93

COST:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

ROCK:

-0.39

COST:

1.65

Martin Ratio

ROCK:

-0.97

COST:

4.74

Ulcer Index

ROCK:

20.25%

COST:

6.04%

Daily Std Dev

ROCK:

38.15%

COST:

22.13%

Max Drawdown

ROCK:

-88.34%

COST:

-53.39%

Current Drawdown

ROCK:

-41.99%

COST:

-3.28%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ROCK:

$1.75B

COST:

$449.51B

EPS

ROCK:

$4.35

COST:

$17.05

PE Ratio

ROCK:

13.65

COST:

59.16

PEG Ratio

ROCK:

1.02

COST:

5.36

PS Ratio

ROCK:

1.34

COST:

1.70

PB Ratio

ROCK:

1.73

COST:

17.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

ROCK:

$1.31B

COST:

$264.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ROCK:

$349.31M

COST:

$35.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

ROCK:

$182.44M

COST:

$11.25B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROCK achieves a -0.54% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 13.80% return. Over the past 10 years, ROCK has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 12.54%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 24.24% annualized return.


ROCK

YTD

-0.54%

1M

10.63%

6M

-19.13%

1Y

-20.46%

3Y*

11.94%

5Y*

5.89%

10Y*

12.54%

COST

YTD

13.80%

1M

4.73%

6M

7.29%

1Y

28.24%

3Y*

32.50%

5Y*

29.64%

10Y*

24.24%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Gibraltar Industries, Inc.

Costco Wholesale Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ROCK vs. COST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROCK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ROCK is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ROCK is 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ROCK is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ROCK is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ROCK is 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ROCK is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COST is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COST is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COST is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COST is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COST is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COST is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ROCK vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gibraltar Industries, Inc. (ROCK) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ROCK Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROCK and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ROCK vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

ROCK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ROCK
Gibraltar Industries, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.46%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%

Drawdowns

ROCK vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROCK drawdown since its inception was -88.34%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROCK and COST.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ROCK vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Gibraltar Industries, Inc. (ROCK) has a higher volatility of 11.55% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 5.12%. This indicates that ROCK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ROCK vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gibraltar Industries, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20212022202320242025
290.02M
63.72B
(ROCK) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ROCK vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gibraltar Industries, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20212022202320242025
26.8%
15.1%
(ROCK) Gross Margin
(COST) Gross Margin
ROCK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Gibraltar Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 77.70M and revenue of 290.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.8%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of 9.61B and revenue of 63.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.

ROCK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Gibraltar Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 25.51M and revenue of 290.02M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.32B and revenue of 63.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.6%.

ROCK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Gibraltar Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 21.12M and revenue of 290.02M, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 1.79B and revenue of 63.72B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.