ROCK vs. ASML

In the year-to-date period, ROCK achieves a -10.31% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's -3.41% return. Over the past 10 years, ROCK has underperformed ASML with an annualized return of 12.22%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively higher 21.14% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gibraltar Industries, Inc. (ROCK) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ROCK Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the ASML Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROCK and ASML, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ROCK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.

The maximum ROCK drawdown since its inception was -88.34%, roughly equal to the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROCK and ASML. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Gibraltar Industries, Inc. (ROCK) is 16.46%, while ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) has a volatility of 20.68%. This indicates that ROCK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gibraltar Industries, Inc. and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.