PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNWGX vs. FNWFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNWGX vs. FNWFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6 (RNWGX) and American Funds New World Fund Class F-3 (FNWFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with RNWGX at 13.85% and FNWFX at 13.85%.


RNWGX

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.11%
6M
7.29%
YTD
13.85%
1Y
26.75%
3Y*
17.24%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*
10.55%
ALL TIME*
7.91%

FNWFX

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.11%
6M
7.29%
YTD
13.85%
1Y
26.75%
3Y*
17.24%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RNWGX vs. FNWFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNWGX
American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6
13.85%28.67%6.88%16.26%-21.77%5.09%25.30%28.03%-12.00%26.57%
FNWFX
American Funds New World Fund Class F-3
13.85%28.67%6.88%16.24%-21.77%5.09%25.30%28.02%-12.00%25.87%

Correlation

The correlation between RNWGX and FNWFX is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

1.00

The correlation between RNWGX and FNWFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNWGX vs. FNWFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RNWGX
RNWGX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
RNWGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNWGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNWGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
RNWGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNWGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FNWFX
FNWFX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FNWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FNWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RNWGX vs. FNWFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6 (RNWGX) and American Funds New World Fund Class F-3 (FNWFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RNWGXFNWFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.31

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

2.24

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.09

8.09

0.00

RNWGX vs. FNWFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNWGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the FNWFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNWGX and FNWFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RNWGX vs. FNWFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNWGX drawdown since its inception was -33.40%, roughly equal to the maximum FNWFX drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNWGX and FNWFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNWGXFNWFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.40%

-33.40%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.00%

-13.00%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.00%

-15.00%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.40%

-33.40%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.19%

-4.19%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-8.59%

+0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

3.59%

0.00%

Volatility

RNWGX vs. FNWFX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6 (RNWGX) and American Funds New World Fund Class F-3 (FNWFX) have volatilities of 7.14% and 7.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNWGXFNWFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.14%

7.12%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.95%

15.95%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.80%

17.79%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.99%

15.99%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.34%

16.62%

-0.28%

RNWGX vs. FNWFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RNWGX and FNWFX have an expense ratio of 0.57%.


Dividends

RNWGX vs. FNWFX - Dividend Comparison

RNWGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%, which matches FNWFX's 5.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNWFX
American Funds New World Fund Class F-3
5.35%6.09%4.10%2.88%1.33%7.32%0.43%4.04%2.70%2.27%0.00%0.00%
RNWGX
American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6
5.35%6.09%4.11%2.88%1.33%7.32%0.44%4.05%2.71%2.26%1.37%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, RNWGX and FNWFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RNWGX has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to FNWFX (7.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNWGX dropped -33.40% vs FNWFX's -33.40%.

FNWFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNWGX and FNWFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer