PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNWGX vs. FNWFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNWGX vs. FNWFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6 (RNWGX) and American Funds New World Fund Class F-3 (FNWFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with RNWGX at 16.74% and FNWFX at 16.74%.


RNWGX

1D
-0.73%
1M
5.68%
YTD
16.74%
6M
18.21%
1Y
34.81%
3Y*
19.66%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
11.36%

FNWFX

1D
-0.73%
1M
5.68%
YTD
16.74%
6M
18.20%
1Y
34.79%
3Y*
19.65%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNWGX vs. FNWFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNWGX
American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6
16.74%28.67%6.88%16.26%-21.77%5.09%25.30%28.03%-12.00%25.90%
FNWFX
American Funds New World Fund Class F-3
16.74%28.67%6.88%16.24%-21.77%5.09%25.30%28.02%-12.00%25.87%

Correlation

The correlation between RNWGX and FNWFX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

1.00

The correlation between RNWGX and FNWFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNWGX vs. FNWFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNWGX
RNWGX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
RNWGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNWGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNWGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
RNWGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNWGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FNWFX
FNWFX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FNWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FNWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNWGX vs. FNWFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6 (RNWGX) and American Funds New World Fund Class F-3 (FNWFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RNWGXFNWFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.46

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

2.76

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.36

11.36

0.00

RNWGX vs. FNWFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNWGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the FNWFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNWGX and FNWFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RNWGXFNWFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

2.44

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.46

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.69

-0.17

Drawdowns

RNWGX vs. FNWFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNWGX drawdown since its inception was -33.40%, roughly equal to the maximum FNWFX drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNWGX and FNWFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNWGXFNWFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.40%

-33.40%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.00%

-13.00%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.00%

-15.00%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.40%

-33.40%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.73%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.06%

-8.68%

+0.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

3.16%

0.00%

Volatility

RNWGX vs. FNWFX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6 (RNWGX) and American Funds New World Fund Class F-3 (FNWFX) have volatilities of 5.56% and 5.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNWGXFNWFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

5.56%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.53%

12.53%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.74%

14.73%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

15.42%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.14%

16.40%

-0.26%

RNWGX vs. FNWFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RNWGX and FNWFX have an expense ratio of 0.57%.


Dividends

RNWGX vs. FNWFX - Dividend Comparison

RNWGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, which matches FNWFX's 5.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNWFX
American Funds New World Fund Class F-3
5.21%6.09%4.10%2.88%1.33%7.32%0.43%4.04%2.70%2.27%0.00%0.00%
RNWGX
American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6
5.22%6.09%4.11%2.88%1.33%7.32%0.44%4.05%2.71%2.26%1.37%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, RNWGX and FNWFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FNWFX has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to RNWGX (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNWGX dropped -33.40% vs FNWFX's -33.40%.

FNWFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNWGX and FNWFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer