PortfoliosLab logo
RNRG vs. XLU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RNRG and XLU is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

RNRG vs. XLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) and Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RNRG:

-0.59

XLU:

0.93

Sortino Ratio

RNRG:

-0.59

XLU:

1.55

Omega Ratio

RNRG:

0.92

XLU:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

RNRG:

-0.19

XLU:

1.80

Martin Ratio

RNRG:

-0.75

XLU:

4.59

Ulcer Index

RNRG:

14.50%

XLU:

4.12%

Daily Std Dev

RNRG:

21.09%

XLU:

17.20%

Max Drawdown

RNRG:

-58.79%

XLU:

-52.27%

Current Drawdown

RNRG:

-52.98%

XLU:

-1.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNRG achieves a 3.00% return, which is significantly lower than XLU's 6.76% return.


RNRG

YTD

3.00%

1M

8.89%

6M

-3.20%

1Y

-12.66%

5Y*

-6.10%

10Y*

N/A

XLU

YTD

6.76%

1M

6.42%

6M

2.90%

1Y

16.03%

5Y*

10.95%

10Y*

9.93%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RNRG vs. XLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNRG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XLU's 0.13% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RNRG vs. XLU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNRG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RNRG is 66
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RNRG is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RNRG is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RNRG is 44
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RNRG is 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RNRG is 88
Martin Ratio Rank

XLU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLU is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLU is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLU is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLU is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLU is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLU is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RNRG vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) and Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RNRG Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the XLU Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNRG and XLU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

RNRG vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison

RNRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than XLU's 2.84% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RNRG
Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF
1.43%1.47%1.43%1.15%1.10%3.17%2.96%5.24%4.14%5.02%3.48%0.00%
XLU
Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund
2.84%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.42%3.67%3.19%

Drawdowns

RNRG vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNRG drawdown since its inception was -58.79%, which is greater than XLU's maximum drawdown of -52.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNRG and XLU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

RNRG vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) is 4.39%, while Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU) has a volatility of 4.93%. This indicates that RNRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...