PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNR vs. MUFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RNR vs. MUFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNR achieves a -1.08% return, which is significantly lower than MUFG's 26.42% return. Over the past 10 years, RNR has underperformed MUFG with an annualized return of 10.06%, while MUFG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.80% annualized return.


RNR

1D
-1.03%
1M
-8.05%
YTD
-1.08%
6M
3.67%
1Y
13.19%
3Y*
13.50%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*
10.06%

MUFG

1D
3.08%
1M
12.89%
YTD
26.42%
6M
25.16%
1Y
47.70%
3Y*
46.42%
5Y*
32.03%
10Y*
17.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNR vs. MUFG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNR
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
-1.08%13.73%27.76%7.22%9.86%3.07%-14.70%47.76%7.54%-6.94%
MUFG
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
26.42%39.96%40.10%33.50%27.37%25.70%-15.99%11.50%-33.01%20.99%

Correlation

The correlation between RNR and MUFG is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2001

0.22

The correlation between RNR and MUFG shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.23 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RNR:

$11.84B

MUFG:

$224.27B

EPS

RNR:

$67.75

MUFG:

$214.15

PE Ratio

RNR:

4.10

MUFG:

0.09

PEG Ratio

RNR:

0.06

MUFG:

0.00

PS Ratio

RNR:

1.10

MUFG:

0.02

PB Ratio

RNR:

1.03

MUFG:

0.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

RNR:

$11.49B

MUFG:

$13.21T

Gross Profit (TTM)

RNR:

$5.12B

MUFG:

$7.24T

EBITDA (TTM)

RNR:

$4.18B

MUFG:

$3.34T

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNR vs. MUFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNR
RNR Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
RNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
RNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNR Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

MUFG
MUFG Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MUFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUFG Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
MUFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUFG Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNR vs. MUFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RNRMUFGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.31

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

2.77

-1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.36

7.76

-4.40

RNR vs. MUFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNR Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the MUFG Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNR and MUFG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RNRMUFGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

1.86

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

1.11

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.64

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.18

+0.37

Drawdowns

RNR vs. MUFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNR drawdown since its inception was -45.67%, smaller than the maximum MUFG drawdown of -76.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNR and MUFG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNRMUFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.67%

-76.75%

+31.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.27%

-17.28%

+4.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.10%

-26.56%

+3.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.71%

-32.81%

+5.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.66%

-57.62%

+16.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.89%

0.00%

-11.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.26%

-43.58%

+33.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.94%

6.16%

-2.22%

Volatility

RNR vs. MUFG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) is 5.39%, while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that RNR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNRMUFGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.39%

6.85%

-1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.41%

19.20%

-3.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.34%

25.79%

-3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.53%

29.05%

-1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.80%

27.90%

-1.10%

Dividends

RNR vs. MUFG - Dividend Comparison

RNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than MUFG's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUFG
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.12%3.12%2.50%2.90%3.36%2.18%2.62%0.00%0.00%2.20%2.70%2.34%
RNR
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
0.58%0.57%0.63%0.78%0.80%0.85%0.84%0.69%0.99%1.02%0.91%1.06%

Financials

RNR vs. MUFG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00T2.00T3.00T4.00T20222023202420252026
2.19B
3.59T
(RNR) Total Revenue
(MUFG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RNR vs. MUFG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
58.3%
Portfolio components
RNR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MUFG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.09T and revenue of 3.59T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.3%.

RNR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 13.75K and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

MUFG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 841.39B and revenue of 3.59T, resulting in an operating margin of 23.4%.

RNR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 581.80M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in a net margin of 26.5%.

MUFG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 624.99B and revenue of 3.59T, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RNR and MUFG have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUFG has higher volatility (6.85%) compared to RNR (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNR dropped -45.67% vs MUFG's -76.75%.

MUFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNR and MUFG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer