PortfoliosLab logo
RNEW vs. UTF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RNEW and UTF is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

RNEW vs. UTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Green Infrastructure ETF (RNEW) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RNEW:

0.09

UTF:

1.53

Sortino Ratio

RNEW:

0.18

UTF:

1.80

Omega Ratio

RNEW:

1.02

UTF:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

RNEW:

0.01

UTF:

1.85

Martin Ratio

RNEW:

0.04

UTF:

5.33

Ulcer Index

RNEW:

7.15%

UTF:

4.16%

Daily Std Dev

RNEW:

23.39%

UTF:

16.29%

Max Drawdown

RNEW:

-25.83%

UTF:

-72.65%

Current Drawdown

RNEW:

-11.13%

UTF:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNEW achieves a -1.81% return, which is significantly lower than UTF's 11.91% return.


RNEW

YTD

-1.81%

1M

3.28%

6M

-5.03%

1Y

2.19%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

UTF

YTD

11.91%

1M

3.27%

6M

3.52%

1Y

24.73%

3Y*

5.93%

5Y*

10.86%

10Y*

10.03%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VanEck Green Infrastructure ETF

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RNEW vs. UTF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNEW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RNEW is 1616
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RNEW is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RNEW is 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RNEW is 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RNEW is 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RNEW is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

UTF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UTF is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UTF is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UTF is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UTF is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UTF is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UTF is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RNEW vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Green Infrastructure ETF (RNEW) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RNEW Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the UTF Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNEW and UTF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

RNEW vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison

RNEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than UTF's 7.14% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RNEW
VanEck Green Infrastructure ETF
0.81%0.80%0.86%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UTF
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc
7.14%7.74%8.76%7.75%6.53%7.20%7.10%10.12%7.37%10.51%8.39%6.51%

Drawdowns

RNEW vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNEW drawdown since its inception was -25.83%, smaller than the maximum UTF drawdown of -72.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNEW and UTF.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

RNEW vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Green Infrastructure ETF (RNEW) has a higher volatility of 5.43% compared to Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) at 3.36%. This indicates that RNEW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...